Publication: Effect of atenolol on symptomatic ventricular arrhythmia without structural heart disease
Issued Date
2000-11-01
Resource Type
ISSN
01252208
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-14344279061
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand. Vol.83, No.SUPPL. 2 (2000)
Suggested Citation
Rungroj Krittayaphong, Kiertijai Bhuripanyo, Ongkarn Raungratanaamporn, Charn Sriratanasathavorn, Kesaree Punlee, Charuwan Kangkagate, Wanna Cheumsuk, Suphachai Chaithiraphan Effect of atenolol on symptomatic ventricular arrhythmia without structural heart disease. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand. Vol.83, No.SUPPL. 2 (2000). Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/26127
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
Effect of atenolol on symptomatic ventricular arrhythmia without structural heart disease
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Ventricular arrhythmia (VA) from right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) is a common problem. Symptomatic patients are usually treated with beta-blockers. There is little data on the systematic evaluation of the drug efficacy. The objectives of this study were 1) To determine proportion of exercise induced ventricular arrhythmia among patients with symptomatic ventricular arrhythmia and 2) to determine the response to beta blockers and the correlation between the response to beta blockers and exercise induced VA. We prospectively studied 46 consecutive patients with symptomatic ventricular arrhythmia. Patients recorded their symptom scores underwent exercise testing and 24-hour ambulatory monitoring before treatment and 1 month after atenolol. Exercise induced ventricular arrhythmia was demonstrated in 28 per cent of patients with symptomatic ventricular arrhythmia. Atenolol improves symptoms, decreases PVC count from ambulatory monitoring, increases exercise duration and suppresses malignant form of VA during exercise. These effects are at a similar extent in both groups of patients: those with and without exercise induced VA. However, the effect on ventricular arrhythmia suppression during exercise of atenolol was seen only in patients with increased PVC during exercise. In conclusion, atenolol is a good option in treating patients with symptomatic VA from RVOT regardless of the pattern of PVC response to exercise. Atenolol can suppress PVC during exercise testing better in patients with exercise induced VA compared to those without.