Publication:
The short and midterm outcomes of lumbar transforaminal epidural injection with preganglionic and postganglionic approach in lumbosacral radiculopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

dc.contributor.authorSaran Pairuchvejen_US
dc.contributor.authorAlisara Arirachakaranen_US
dc.contributor.authorGun Keorochanaen_US
dc.contributor.authorKomkrich Wattanapaiboonen_US
dc.contributor.authorSurapon Atiprayoonen_US
dc.contributor.authorPhoonyathorn Phatthanathitikarnen_US
dc.contributor.authorJatupon Kongtharvonskulen_US
dc.contributor.otherPolice General Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherQueen Savang Sadhana memorial hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherQueen Savang Vadhana Memorial Hospitalen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-23T11:42:21Z
dc.date.available2019-08-23T11:42:21Z
dc.date.issued2018-10-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2017, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes after preganglionic versus ganglionic epidural steroid injection (ESI) using a systematic review and network meta-analysis. A systematic review and meta-regression was performed to compare postoperative outcomes between the two difference injection techniques. Relevant randomized controlled trials were identified from Medline and Scopus up to September 24, 2016. Sixteen out of 598 studies were eligible; 3, 2, and 3 studies were included in the pooling of outcomes including effectiveness, visual analog score (VAS), and complications (nerve root, injury, dural puncture, and intraneural injection). Preganglionic ESI has a 2.38 (95% CI 1.12, 5.04) times statistically significantly higher chance of effectiveness when compared to ganglionic ESI. There were differences in pain VAS and complications in lumbar radiculopathy, but these displayed no statistical significance. This meta-analysis indicated that preganglionic ESI has a statistically significantly higher chance of effectiveness when compared to ganglionic ESI. In terms of pain score and complications, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups. These results were generally homogeneous and with little publication bias, thus should be generalizable.en_US
dc.identifier.citationNeurosurgical Review. Vol.41, No.4 (2018), 909-916en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10143-017-0826-zen_US
dc.identifier.issn14372320en_US
dc.identifier.issn03445607en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85011715987en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/46300
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85011715987&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleThe short and midterm outcomes of lumbar transforaminal epidural injection with preganglionic and postganglionic approach in lumbosacral radiculopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysisen_US
dc.typeReviewen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85011715987&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections