Publication:
A comparison between the online prediction models cancermath and predict as prognostic tools in Thai breast cancer patients

dc.contributor.authorNuanphan Polchaien_US
dc.contributor.authorDoonyapat Sa-Nguanraksaen_US
dc.contributor.authorWarapan Numprasiten_US
dc.contributor.authorThanawat Thumrongtaradolen_US
dc.contributor.authorEng O-Charoenraten_US
dc.contributor.authorPornchai O-Charoenraten_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity College Londonen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-25T11:16:37Z
dc.date.available2020-08-25T11:16:37Z
dc.date.issued2020-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2020 Polchai et al. Background and Purpose: Web-based prognostic calculators have been developed to inform about the use of adjuvant systemic treatments in breast cancer. CancerMath and PREDICT are two examples of web-based prognostic tools that predict patient survival up to 15 years after an initial diagnosis of breast cancer. The aim of this study is to validate the use of CancerMath and PREDICT as prognostic tools in Thai breast cancer patients. Patients and Methods: A total of 615 patients who underwent surgical treatment for stage I to III breast cancer from 2003 to 2011 at the Division of Head Neck and Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Thailand were recruited. A model-predicted overall survival rate (OS) and the actual OS of the patients were compared. The efficacy of the model was evaluated using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Results: For CancerMath, the predicted 5-year OS was 88.9% and the predicted 10-year OS was 78.3% (p<0.001). For PREDICT, the predicted 5-year OS was 83.1% and the predicted 10-year OS was 72.0% (p<0.001). The actual observed 5-year OS was 90.8% and the observed 10-year OS was 82.6% (p<0.001). CancerMath demonstrated better predictive performance than PREDICT in all subgroups for both 5-and 10-year OS. In addition, there was a marked difference between CancerMath and observed survival rates in patients who were older as well as patients who were stage N3. The area under the ROC curve for 5-year OS in CancerMath and 10-year OS was 0.74 (95% CI; 0.65–0.82) and 0.75 (95% CI; 0.68–0.82). In the PREDICT group, the area under the ROC curve for 5-year OS was 0.78 (95% CI; 0.71–0.85) and for 10-year OS, it was 0.78 (95% CI; 0.71–0.84). Conclusion: CancerMath and PREDICT models both underestimated the OS in Thai breast cancer patients. Thus, a novel prognostic model for Thai breast cancer patients is required.en_US
dc.identifier.citationCancer Management and Research. Vol.12, (2020), 5549-5559en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.2147/CMAR.S258143en_US
dc.identifier.issn11791322en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85087626254en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/58280
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85087626254&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleA comparison between the online prediction models cancermath and predict as prognostic tools in Thai breast cancer patientsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85087626254&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections