Publication: The anesthesia efficacy of intraosseous injection with QuickSleeper® and conventional injection in the lower third molar surgery.
Accepted Date
2013-06-25
Issued Date
2013-09
Resource Type
Language
eng
ISSN
0125-5614 (printed)
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
Faculty of Dentistry Mahidol University
Bibliographic Citation
Kiattavorncharoen S, Manosuthi P, Wongsirichat N, Boonsiriseth K. The anesthesia efficacy of intraosseous injection with QuickSleeper® and conventional injection in the lower third molar surgery. M Dent J. 2013; 33(3): 137-43.
Suggested Citation
Sirichai Kiattavorncharoen, ศิริชัย เกียรติถาวรเจริญ, Pattamawan Manosuthi, ปัทมวรรณ มโนสุทธิ, Natthamet Wongsirichat, ณัฐเมศร์ วงศ์สิริฉัตร, Kiatanant Boonsiriseth, เกียรติอนันต์ บุญศิริเศรษฐ The anesthesia efficacy of intraosseous injection with QuickSleeper® and conventional injection in the lower third molar surgery.. Kiattavorncharoen S, Manosuthi P, Wongsirichat N, Boonsiriseth K. The anesthesia efficacy of intraosseous injection with QuickSleeper® and conventional injection in the lower third molar surgery. M Dent J. 2013; 33(3): 137-43.. Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/1057
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
The anesthesia efficacy of intraosseous injection with QuickSleeper® and conventional injection in the lower third molar surgery.
Corresponding Author(s)
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to compare the efficacy of anesthesia between
QuickSleeper® and conventional injection in the lower third molar surgery.
Materials and methods: The study with a simple blind prospective study
was comprised 12 females and 14 males with age range 20-25 years (mean
age of 21 years). The subjects underwent a total of 52 anesthetic procedures.
Each patient was subjected to two anesthetic techniques :conventional
injection and intraosseous injection using the QuickSleeper® system. A
split-mouth design with a month washout period was adopted in which
each patient underwent treatment of lower third molar surgery.
Results: The profoundness of anesthesia by QuickSleeper® and
conventional technique are 30.7% and 92.3%, respectively. Pain assessment
during injection was 2.7±2.2 for QuickSleeper® and 2.8±2.5 for conventional
technique, the difference being not statistically significant. Pain assessment
during surgery was 5.2±3.0 for QuickSleeper® and 2.5±2.7 for conventional
technique, the difference being statistically significant. Pain assessment
after surgery was 1.8±2.4 for QuickSleeper® and 1.8±2.2for conventional
technique, the difference being not statistically significant.
Conclusion: The efficacy of anesthesia from QuickSleeper® is lower than
conventional injection in the lower third molar surgery.