Publication: Are physical therapists in Viet Nam ready to implement evidence-based practice? A survey
Issued Date
2018-12-22
Resource Type
ISSN
14726920
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-85058917054
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
BMC Medical Education. Vol.18, No.1 (2018)
Suggested Citation
Hiep Thi Dao, Sopa Pichaiyongwongdee, Patricia E. Sullivan, Saipin Prasertsukdee, Benjawan Apinonkul Are physical therapists in Viet Nam ready to implement evidence-based practice? A survey. BMC Medical Education. Vol.18, No.1 (2018). doi:10.1186/s12909-018-1428-3 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/47396
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
Are physical therapists in Viet Nam ready to implement evidence-based practice? A survey
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
© 2018 The Author(s). Background: Evidence-based practice (EBP) enhances healthcare services and keeps providers current with best practices. EBP has been adopted and spread worldwide. However, people will not apply it if they do not know, understand, or believe it. Few studies have considered EBP application in Viet Nam. This study explores whether Vietnamese physical therapists' attitude, knowledge, skills toward EBP and barriers to its use make them ready to implement its practice. Methods: A survey questionnaire was sent directly to physical therapists in governmental healthcare organizations in Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam, from July to October, 2017. It consisted of 41 closed- and open-ended questions related to knowledge, attitude, behaviors, frequency of use, and barriers of EBP and the demographic characteristics of participants. Descriptive statistics and significant correlations were determined from Chi-Square statistics or odds ratios between the variables. Results: The return rate was 93% (421 out of 453). Eliminated were 40 responses inconsistent with inclusion criteria. The 381 eligible participants were more female (62%) than male, about 53% had vocational degrees, less than 1% had M.S. degrees. Participants reported a positive attitude toward EBP. An incongruity existed between knowledge/ skills of EBP and the frequency of using its 5 steps. English competence was the most critical barrier to applying EBP. The significant associations between attitude and knowledge, and demographical attributes indicated that younger therapists with lower educational degrees had less knowledge of EBP and they rarely employed the application and analytical steps 4 and 5. Conclusions: The incongruity between knowledge and use of EBP may result from the lack of EBP in academic education. The skills of reading professional articles in the English language and understanding and applying the steps of EBP should be emphasized in academic physical therapy programs. Additionally, policy makers should consider the number of patients a day per physical therapist which impacts EBP use and the quality of healthcare service.