Publication:
Both EMLA and placebo cream reduced pain during extracorporeal piezoelectric shock wave lithotripsy with the piezolith 2300

dc.contributor.authorThara Tritrakarnen_US
dc.contributor.authorJariya Lertakyamaneeen_US
dc.contributor.authorPisamorn Koompongen_US
dc.contributor.authorSuchai Soontrapaen_US
dc.contributor.authorPradit Somprakiten_US
dc.contributor.authorAnupan Tantiwongen_US
dc.contributor.authorSunee Jittapapaien_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-07T09:23:24Z
dc.date.available2018-09-07T09:23:24Z
dc.date.issued2000-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: The objectives were to determine whether a eutectic mixture of local anesthetic (EMLA) or placebo cream reduces pain during extracorporeal piezoelectric shock wave lithotripsy (EPSWL), and to determine which of the components of the application (i.e., the occlusive dressing, the cream, or the local anesthetic) contributes to analgesia. Methods: A randomized, double blind, crossover study (part 1) was performed in 12 patients who were scheduled for EPSWL procedures on an ambulatory basis who received the first treatment without any intervention and who had verbal pain scores of 70 or more (on a 0-to-100 scale). For the next two treatments at 2- week intervals, patients were randomly assigned to receive either 10 g EMLA or 10 g placebo cream and then crossed over to receive the other. The cream and occlusive dressing were left in place and immersed in water throughout the procedure. Verbal numeric pain score was assessed at 5 min after receiving the maximal tolerable intensity of shock wave and at the end of the procedure. The study continued (part 2) in 202 ambulatory patients; 125 men and 77 women, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and II, subjected to EPSWL were randomly allocated into five groups who received (1) nothing on the skin (control), (2) plastic occlusive dressing, (3) placebo cream and plastic occlusive dressing, (4) EMLA cream and plastic occlusive dressing, (5) EMLA cream and plastic occlusive dressing for 60 min to achieve cutaneous anesthesia, which was removed before EPSWL. Pain score was evaluated 10 min into the procedure and at the end of the procedure. Result: Both parts of the study showed that patients who received either EMLA or placebo cream with dressing throughout the procedure experienced less pain and tolerated higher energy levels compared with the control. Patients who received only pre-EPSWL cutaneous anesthesia of EMLA and who received only the occlusive dressing did not have a reduction in pain score. Conclusions: EMLA and placebo creams under occlusive dressing reduced pain during EPSWL. The presence of the cream itself as a coupling medium contributed to analgesia. This may be a useful, simple, safe, and economical adjuvant technique to reduce pain during immersion EPSWL.en_US
dc.identifier.citationAnesthesiology. Vol.92, No.4 (2000), 1049-1054en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/00000542-200004000-00023en_US
dc.identifier.issn00033022en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-0034028938en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/26321
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0034028938&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleBoth EMLA and placebo cream reduced pain during extracorporeal piezoelectric shock wave lithotripsy with the piezolith 2300en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0034028938&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections