Publication:
Bioequivalence of indinavir capsules in healthy volunteers

dc.contributor.authorSuvatna Chulavatnatolen_US
dc.contributor.authorKumthorn Malathumen_US
dc.contributor.authorSasisopin Kiertiburanakulen_US
dc.contributor.authorKittisak Sriphaen_US
dc.contributor.authorPojawon Lawanpraserten_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Pharmacyen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-24T08:48:08Z
dc.date.available2018-09-24T08:48:08Z
dc.date.issued2010-02-01en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Indinavir, one component in the HAART regimen, plays an important role in the current treatment of HIV-infection and AIDS. Availability and accessibility of qualified generic indinavir to patients may be the keys for the success of treatment. Objective: Compare the rate and extent of absorption of a generic indinavir formulation with those of an original formulation in healthy Thai volunteers. Method: A randomized, two-period, two-treatment, two-sequence, crossover study with a two-week washout period was performed. A single dose of 2x400 mg indinavir capsules of each formulation was administered to 24 volunteers after an overnight fast. Indinavir plasma concentrations up to 10 hours postdose were determined using high-performance liquid chromatography. Relevant pharmacokinetic parameters were derived and tested for statistically significant differences using ANOVA and criteria of bioequivalence determination were applied. Results: No statistically significant differences were demonstrated for pharmacokinetic parameters including Cmax, Tmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-8 derived from the two formulations (n=23, p>0.05). The criteria of bioequivalence determination i.e., the 90% confidence intervals on the mean ratio (generic/original formulation) of natural logarithmtransformed values of C max, AUC 0-t and AUC 0-∞ were 86.3-106.5%, 94.0-108.5%, and 93.9-108.5%, respectively. Conclusion: As the mean ratios of C max, AUC 0-t and AUC 0-∞ of the generic and original formulations were entirely within the guideline range of bioequivalence (80.0-125.0%), the two formulations were considered bioequivalent in terms of rate and extent of absorption.en_US
dc.identifier.citationAsian Biomedicine. Vol.4, No.1 (2010), 98-101en_US
dc.identifier.issn19057415en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-77957968642en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/28794
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=77957968642&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biologyen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleBioequivalence of indinavir capsules in healthy volunteersen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=77957968642&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections