Publication: Clinical prediction rules for failed nonoperative reduction of intussusception
Issued Date
2016-09-13
Resource Type
ISSN
1178203X
11766336
11766336
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-84988985676
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management. Vol.12, (2016), 1411-1416
Suggested Citation
Jiraporn Khorana, Jayanton Patumanond, Nuthapong Ukarapol, Mongkol Laohapensang, Pannee Visrutaratna, Jesda Singhavejsakul Clinical prediction rules for failed nonoperative reduction of intussusception. Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management. Vol.12, (2016), 1411-1416. doi:10.2147/TCRM.S115253 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/43325
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
Clinical prediction rules for failed nonoperative reduction of intussusception
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
© 2016 Khorana et al. Purpose: The nonoperative reduction of intussusception in children can be performed safely if there are no contraindications. Many risk factors associated with failed reduction were defined. The aim of this study was to develop a scoring system for predicting the failure of nonoperative reduction using various determinants. Patients and methods: The data were collected from Chiang Mai University Hospital and Siriraj Hospital from January 2006 to December 2012. Inclusion criteria consisted of patients with intussusception aged 0–15 years with no contraindications for nonoperative reduction. The clinical prediction rules were developed using significant risk factors from the multivariable analysis. Results: A total of 170 patients with intussusception were included in the study. In the final analysis model, 154 patients were used for identifying the significant risk factors of failure of reduction. Ten factors clustering by the age of 3 years were identified and used for developing the clinical prediction rules, and the factors were as follows: body weight,12 kg (relative risk [RR] =1.48, P=0.004), duration of symptoms .48 hours (RR =1.26, P,0.001), vomiting (RR =1.63, P<0.001), rectal bleeding (RR =1.50, P<0.001), abdominal distension (RR =1.60, P=0.003), temperature .37.8°C (RR =1.51, P<0.001), palpable mass (RR =1.26, P<0.001), location of mass (left over right side RR =1.48, P<0.001), ultrasound showed poor prognostic signs (RR =1.35, P<0.001), and the method of reduction (hydrostatic over pneumatic, RR =1.34, P=0.023). Prediction scores ranged from 0 to 16. A high-risk group (scores 12–16) predicted a greater chance of reduction failure (likelihood ratio of positive [LR+] =18.22, P<0.001). A low-r sk group (score 0–11) predicted a lower chance of reduction failure (LR+ =0.79, P<0.001). The performance of the scoring model was 80.68% (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve). Conclusion: This scoring guideline was used to predict the results of nonoperative reduction and forecast the prognosis of the failed reduction. The usefulness of these prediction scores is for informing the parents before the reduction. This scoring system can be used as a guide to promote the possible referral of the cases to tertiary centers with facilities for nonoperative reduction if possible.