Publication:
Delayed Pressure Urticaria: A Systematic Review of Treatment Options

dc.contributor.authorKanokvalai Kulthananen_US
dc.contributor.authorPatompong Ungpraserten_US
dc.contributor.authorPapapit Tuchindaen_US
dc.contributor.authorLeena Chularojanamontrien_US
dc.contributor.authorNorramon Charoenpipatsinen_US
dc.contributor.authorMarcus Maureren_US
dc.contributor.otherCharité – Universitätsmedizin Berlinen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-25T10:37:56Z
dc.date.available2020-08-25T10:37:56Z
dc.date.issued2020-06-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2020 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Background: Delayed pressure urticaria (DPU) is characterized by recurrent erythematous and often painful swelling after the skin is exposed to sustained pressure. Treatment is challenging. Antihistamines, the first-line and only approved treatment, are often not effective. Objective: To systematically review the treatment options for DPU. Method: A literature search of electronic databases for all relevant articles published till April 29, 2019, was conducted using the search terms “delayed pressure urticaria” and “pressure urticaria.” This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses recommendations. Results: Twenty-one studies (8 randomized controlled trials [RCTs], 10 retrospective cohort studies, and 3 open-label prospective studies) were included. Second-generation H1 antihistamines (sgAHs) were effective in 3 RCTs. The combination of an sgAH and montelukast (2 RCTs) or an sgAH and theophylline (1 non-RCT) was more effective than the sgAH alone. The disease improved with omalizumab (4 non-RCTs), sulphones (3 non-RCTs), oral prednisolone (1 RCT and 2 non-RCTs), intravenous immunoglobulin (1 non-RCT), and gluten-free diet (1 non-RCT). There are no studies on updosing of antihistamines over standard dosage in DPU. Conclusions: Overall, the quality of studies on DPU is low. Because of the lack of other evidence, antihistamines remain the first-line therapy. Updosing of sgAHs could be considered in patients with uncontrolled symptoms on the basis of the extrapolation of evidence from chronic spontaneous urticaria, even though there is no evidence of its efficacy over standard dosage. Addition of montelukast may be considered. Omalizumab or sulphones may be used in treatment-resistant patients. High-quality DPU studies should be conducted.en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice. Vol.8, No.6 (2020), 2035-2049.e5en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jaip.2020.03.004en_US
dc.identifier.issn22132198en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85085621364en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/58140
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85085621364&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleDelayed Pressure Urticaria: A Systematic Review of Treatment Optionsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85085621364&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections