Publication:
Avian and pandemic human influenza policy in South-East Asia: The interface between economic and public health imperatives

dc.contributor.authorPetcharat Pongcharoensuken_US
dc.contributor.authorWiku Adisasmitoen_US
dc.contributor.authorLe Minh Saten_US
dc.contributor.authorPornpit Silkavuteen_US
dc.contributor.authorLilis Muchlisohen_US
dc.contributor.authorPham Cong Hoaten_US
dc.contributor.authorRichard Cokeren_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversitas Indonesiaen_US
dc.contributor.otherMinistry of Science and Technologyen_US
dc.contributor.otherThailand Ministry of Public Healthen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-11T05:07:20Z
dc.date.available2018-06-11T05:07:20Z
dc.date.issued2012-08-01en_US
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to analyse the contemporary policies regarding avian and human pandemic influenza control in three South-East Asia countries: Thailand, Indonesia and Vietnam. An analysis of poultry vaccination policy was used to explore the broader policy of influenza A H5N1 control in the region. The policy of antiviral stockpiling with oseltamivir, a scarce regional resource, was used to explore human pandemic influenza preparedness policy. Several policy analysis theories were applied to analyse the debate on the use of vaccination for poultry and stockpiling of antiviral drugs in each country case study. We conducted a comparative analysis across emergent themes.The study found that whilst Indonesia and Vietnam introduced poultry vaccination programmes, Thailand rejected this policy approach. By contrast, all three countries adopted similar strategic policies for antiviral stockpiling in preparation. In relation to highly pathogenic avian influenza, economic imperatives are of critical importance. Whilst Thailand's poultry industry is large and principally an export economy, Vietnam's and Indonesia's are for domestic consumption. The int roduction of a poultry vaccination policy in Thailand would have threatened its potential to trade and had a major impact on its economy. Powerful domestic stakeholders in Vietnam and Indonesia, by contrast, were concerned less about international trade and more about maintaining a healthy domestic poultry population. Evidence on vaccination was drawn upon differently depending upon strategic economic positioning either to support or oppose the policy.With influenza A H5N1 endemic in some countries of the region, these policy differences raise questions around regional coherence of policies and the pursuit of an agreed overarching goal, be that eradication or mitigation. Moreover, whilst economic imperatives have been critically important in guiding policy formulation in the agriculture sector, questions arise regarding whether agriculture sectoral policy is coherent with public health sectoral policy across the region. © The Author 2011; all rights reserved.en_US
dc.identifier.citationHealth Policy and Planning. Vol.27, No.5 (2012), 374-383en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/heapol/czr056en_US
dc.identifier.issn14602237en_US
dc.identifier.issn02681080en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84864567623en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/14713
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84864567623&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleAvian and pandemic human influenza policy in South-East Asia: The interface between economic and public health imperativesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84864567623&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections