Publication: Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analyses of colorectal cancer screenings in a low- and middle-income country: example from Thailand
Issued Date
2019-12-02
Resource Type
ISSN
1941837X
13696998
13696998
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-85074569518
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Journal of Medical Economics. Vol.22, No.12 (2019), 1351-1361
Suggested Citation
Pochamana Phisalprapa, Siripen Supakankunti, Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analyses of colorectal cancer screenings in a low- and middle-income country: example from Thailand. Journal of Medical Economics. Vol.22, No.12 (2019), 1351-1361. doi:10.1080/13696998.2019.1674065 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/51249
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analyses of colorectal cancer screenings in a low- and middle-income country: example from Thailand
Abstract
© 2019, © 2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. Objectives: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs have been reported to be cost-effective in many high-income countries. However, there was no such study in low- and middle-income countries. This study aimed to evaluate cost-effectiveness and budget impact of CRC screening modalities for average-risk persons in Thailand. Methods: A decision tree coupled with a Markov model was used to estimate lifetime costs and health benefits of fecal immunochemical test (FIT) and colonoscopy using a societal perspective. The input parameters were obtained from a CRC screening project at a Thai tertiary care hospital, Thai health care costs and databases, and systematic literature review. Results were reported as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) in 2017 US Dollars (USD) per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the influence of parameter uncertainty. Finally, budget impact analysis was conducted. Results: At the Thai ceiling threshold of societal willingness-to-pay of 4,706 USD, the screening colonoscopy every 10 years and annual FIT, starting at age 50, was cost-effective, as compared to no screening resulting in 15.09 and 15.00 QALYs with the ICERs of 600.20 and 509.84 USD/QALY gained, respectively. Colonoscopy every 10 years and annual FIT could prevent 17.9% and 5.7% of early stage cancer and 27.8% and 9.2% of late stage cancer per 100,000 screening over lifetime when compared to no screening, respectively. The colonoscopy screening was cost-effective with the ICER of 646.53 USD/QALY gained when compared to FIT. The probabilities of being cost-effective for the colonoscopy and FIT were 75% and 25%, respectively. Budget impact analysis showed the colonoscopy screening required an 8-times higher budget than FIT. Conclusions: Colonoscopy offers the best value for money of CRC screenings in Thailand. Annual FIT is potentially feasible since it requires less resources. Our findings can be used as part of evidence for informing policy decision making.Key points for decision makers There was a lack of cost-effective study of colorectal cancer screening programs in low- and middle-income countries. This study evaluated lifetime health outcomes and costs, and the cost-effectiveness of colorectal screening options for average-risk persons in Thailand. Colonoscopy screening every 10 years is cost-effective with high probability of being cost-effective as compared with annual fecal immunochemical test. Screening by annual fecal immunochemical test is more feasible in terms of human resource and budgetary burden. Colorectal screening programs provides an opportunity for early diagnosis and treatments to prevent advance colorectal stages and avoid higher consequent costs. This study contributes a new evidence-based knowledge for Thailand and can be used to support policy decision making process.