Publication:
Comparative evaluation of polymerase chain reaction and restriction enzyme analysis: Two amplified targets, hsp65 and rpoB, for identification of cultured mycobacteria

dc.contributor.authorWattana Cheunoyen_US
dc.contributor.authorTherdsak Prammanananen_US
dc.contributor.authorAngkana Chaipraserten_US
dc.contributor.authorSuporn Foongladdaen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherThailand National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnologyen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-21T08:32:08Z
dc.date.available2018-06-21T08:32:08Z
dc.date.issued2005-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstractThe increasing incidence of tuberculosis and other mycobacterial infections due to AIDS epidemic resulted in the need of rapid and accurate identification of isolated mycobacteria. The correct identification result leads to the selection of an appropriate therapeutic regimen. Polymerase chain reaction and restriction enzyme analysis (PCR-REA) has been developed since 1992 and used as the rapid method for identifying mycobacteria. Several genes or sequences have been used as an amplified target for PCR-REA. The present study aims to evaluate the potential use of PCR-REA of gene-encoding heat shock protein 65 kDa (hsp65) and β-subunit RNA polymerase (rpoB) for the identification of mycobacteria compared with conventional biochemical identification. Two hundreds clinical isolates, consisting of 50 isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and 150 isolates of nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM), were submitted for identification using PCR-REA and biochemical method. The results demonstrated that PCR-REA identified 188 isolates of both M. tuberculosis and NTM concordantly with biochemical identification. Discordant identification results obtained from 12 isolates, comprised of 8 M. scrofulaceum, 1 M. avium complex, 1 M. malmoense, 1 M. terrae complex, and 1 M. chelonae/abscessus. Overall, the concordant percentage of results obtained from PCR-REA compared with biochemical method was 100%, 98.8%, and 83.3% for M. tuberculosis complex, rapidly growing, and slowly growing mycobacteria, respectively, and the results of hsp65 PCR-REA was in agreement with those obtained from rpoB PCR-REA. From this study, PCR-REA appears to be a simple, rapid, and reliable method for identifying mycobacteria in a routine microbiology laboratory. © 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.identifier.citationDiagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease. Vol.51, No.3 (2005), 165-171en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2004.09.006en_US
dc.identifier.issn07328893en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-17644411689en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/17131
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=17644411689&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleComparative evaluation of polymerase chain reaction and restriction enzyme analysis: Two amplified targets, hsp65 and rpoB, for identification of cultured mycobacteriaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=17644411689&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections