Publication:
Concurrent validity and intratester reliability of the video-based system for measuring gait poststroke

dc.contributor.authorNilar Aungen_US
dc.contributor.authorSunee Bovonsunthonchaien_US
dc.contributor.authorVimonwan Hiengkaewen_US
dc.contributor.authorJarugool Tretriluxanaen_US
dc.contributor.authorRommanee Rojasavasteraen_US
dc.contributor.authorAnuchai Pheung-Phrarattanatraien_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Information Technologyen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-27T03:33:34Z
dc.date.available2020-01-27T03:33:34Z
dc.date.issued2020-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Background and purpose: Spatio-temporal parameters are commonly used in gait assessment. Advanced tools provide valid and reliable data, considered very effective for physiotherapy intervention. However, these tools may be limited in clinical usage caused by complicated applicability, inaccessibility, and high cost. Therefore, a video-based system is an alternative choice that is easy and affordable for the clinical setting. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the concurrent validity of the video-based system against the validated instrumented gait system (Force Distribution Measurement [FDM]) on the spatio-temporal gait parameters in individuals with stroke. In addition, the intratester reliability of a novice tester was determined. Methods: Twenty individuals with stroke participated in the study. Gait was captured by the video-based and FDM systems simultaneously to measure the degree of concurrent validity. Parameters composed of the affected and unaffected step lengths (cm) and step time (s), stride length (cm), gait velocity (m/s), and cadence (steps/min). Pearson correlation coefficient, paired t test, and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were used to determine the concurrent validity, the difference of the data, and intratester reliability. Results: All spatio-temporal gait parameters showed excellent degrees of correlation (rp =.94 to.99, p <.001) between the video-based and FDM systems. No significant difference in all parameters was found between the two systems. Excellent intratester reliability (ICC3,1 = 0.91 to 0.99, p <.001) of all gait parameters were found in a novice tester. Conclusion: The video-based system was valid and reliable for a novice tester to measure the spatio-temporal gait parameters in individuals with stroke.en_US
dc.identifier.citationPhysiotherapy Research International. Vol.25, No.1 (2020)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/pri.1803en_US
dc.identifier.issn14712865en_US
dc.identifier.issn13582267en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85070747450en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/49613
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85070747450&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectHealth Professionsen_US
dc.titleConcurrent validity and intratester reliability of the video-based system for measuring gait poststrokeen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85070747450&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections