Publication:
The Ranging Costs of a Fallback Food: Liana Consumption Supplements Diet but Increases Foraging Effort in Howler Monkeys

dc.contributor.authorJacob C. Dunnen_US
dc.contributor.authorNorberto Asensioen_US
dc.contributor.authorVictor Arroyo-Rodríguezen_US
dc.contributor.authorStefan Schnitzeren_US
dc.contributor.authorJurgi Cristóbal-Azkarateen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Cambridgeen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversidad Veracruzanaen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Environment and Resource Studies, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico Centro de Investigaciones en Ecosistemasen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Wisconsin Milwaukeeen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-11T04:29:51Z
dc.date.available2018-06-11T04:29:51Z
dc.date.issued2012-09-01en_US
dc.description.abstractLianas are important components in the dynamics of tropical forests and represent fallback foods for some primates, yet little is known about their impact on primate ecology, behavior or fitness. Using 2 yr of field data, we investigated liana consumption and foraging effort in four groups of howler monkeys (two in bigger, more conserved forest fragments and two in smaller, less conserved fragments) to assess whether howler monkeys use lianas when and where food availability is scarce, and how liana consumption is related to foraging effort. Howler monkeys in smaller fragments spent more time consuming lianas and liana consumption was negatively related to the consumption of preferred food resources (fruit and Ficus spp.). Further, travel time was positively related to liana feeding time, but not to tree feeding time, and howler monkeys visited a greater number of food patches when feeding from liana leaves than when feeding from tree leaves. Our results suggest that these increases in foraging effort were related to the fact that lianas are mainly a source of leaves, and that liana patch size was probably smaller than tree patch size. While these results were clear when analyzing all four groups combined, however, they were not always significant in each of the groups individually. We suggest that this may be related to the differences in group size, patch size and the availability of resources among groups. Further studies are necessary to assess whether these dietary and behavioral adjustments negatively impact on the fitness and conservation of primates in fragments. © 2012 The Author(s) Journal compilation © 2012 by The Association for Tropical Biology and Conservation.en_US
dc.identifier.citationBiotropica. Vol.44, No.5 (2012), 705-714en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1744-7429.2012.00856.xen_US
dc.identifier.issn17447429en_US
dc.identifier.issn00063606en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84865738944en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/13409
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84865738944&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectAgricultural and Biological Sciencesen_US
dc.titleThe Ranging Costs of a Fallback Food: Liana Consumption Supplements Diet but Increases Foraging Effort in Howler Monkeysen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84865738944&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections