Publication:
Validity and reliability of quality of recovery-35 Thai version: a prospective questionnaire-based study

dc.contributor.authorSiriporn Pitimana-areeen_US
dc.contributor.authorSuthipol Udompanthuraken_US
dc.contributor.authorSaowaphak Lapmahapaisanen_US
dc.contributor.authorMatula Tareerathen_US
dc.contributor.authorAungsumat Wangdeeen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University. Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital. Department of Anesthesiologyen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-07T01:22:39Z
dc.date.available2017-08-07T01:22:39Z
dc.date.created2017-08-07
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractBackground: The quality of patients’ recovery following surgery and anesthesia has been a matter of focus and concern over the past decade. The Quality of Recovery-40 (QoR-40) questionnaire was developed and validated for post-anesthesia patient evaluation. The QoR-40, however, is English-based and was tested and validated in Caucasian patients, a population that is culturally and behaviorally different from the Thai population. The objective of this study was to translate and modify the original English-language QoR-40 into the Thai language and evaluate the Quality of Recovery-35 Thai version for measuring health outcomes in Thai patients after surgery and anesthesia. Methods: Translation was performed according to internationally recognized translation standards to ensure the integrity of the translated version. Consistent with the recommendations of 25 anesthesiologists, five questions from the original QoR-40 were excluded. The 35-item questionnaire was then translated into the Thai language and renamed the Quality of Recovery-35 Thai version (Thai QoR-35). Overall, 43 outpatients and 53 inpatients rated their health and recovery status using three patient evaluation tools: 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale–Recovery (VAS-R), six-item Activities of Daily Living (ADL) questionnaire, and Thai QoR-35. Results: Overall, 90 % of patients took <10 min to complete the Thai QoR-35 questionnaire. The Thai QoR-35 and VAS-R showed good convergent validity (r = 0.84, P < 0.001). Discrimination validity was supported by a significant difference in mean scores for recovery among the Thai QoR-35, VAS-R, and ADL when compared between outpatients and inpatients (P < 0.01) and also between baseline and postoperative values (P < 0.001). The Thai QoR-35 also demonstrated good reliability with high internal consistency at three time points (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.88, 0.89, 0.91, respectively; P < 0.01) and a split-half reliability coefficient of 0.65 (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Thai QoR-35 is a valid, reliable tool for evaluating quality of recovery in Thai patients.en_US
dc.identifier.citationBMC Anesthesiology. Vol. 16, (2016), 64en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12871-016-0229-7
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/2675
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderBioMed Centralen_US
dc.subjectOpen Access articleen_US
dc.subjectAnesthesiaen_US
dc.subjectQuality of recoveryen_US
dc.subjectReliabilityen_US
dc.subjectSurgeryen_US
dc.subjectValidityen_US
dc.titleValidity and reliability of quality of recovery-35 Thai version: a prospective questionnaire-based studyen_US
dc.typeResearch Articleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
si-ar-siriporn-2016.pdf
Size:
457.3 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections