Publication:
Algorithm in the Diagnosis of Febrile Illness Using Pathogen-specific Rapid Diagnostic Tests

dc.contributor.authorSunil Pokharelen_US
dc.contributor.authorLisa J. Whiteen_US
dc.contributor.authorRicardo Aguasen_US
dc.contributor.authorOlivier Celhayen_US
dc.contributor.authorKarell G. Pelléen_US
dc.contributor.authorSabine Dittrichen_US
dc.contributor.otherFoundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, Switzerlanden_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherNuffield Department of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-25T10:41:11Z
dc.date.available2020-08-25T10:41:11Z
dc.date.issued2020-05-23en_US
dc.description.abstract© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. BACKGROUND: In the absence of proper guidelines and algorithms, available rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for common acute undifferentiated febrile illnesses are often used inappropriately. METHODS: Using prevalence data of 5 common febrile illnesses from India and Cambodia, and performance characteristics (sensitivity and specificity) of relevant pathogen-specific RDTs, we used a mathematical model to predict the probability of correct identification of each disease when diagnostic testing occurs either simultaneously or sequentially in various algorithms. We developed a web-based application of the model so as to visualize and compare output diagnostic algorithms when different disease prevalence and test performance characteristics are introduced. RESULTS: Diagnostic algorithms with appropriate sequential testing predicted correct identification of etiology in 74% and 89% of patients in India and Cambodia, respectively, compared with 46% and 49% with simultaneous testing. The optimally performing sequential diagnostic algorithms differed in India and Cambodia due to varying disease prevalence. CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneous testing is not appropriate for the diagnosis of acute undifferentiated febrile illnesses with presently available tests, which should deter the unsupervised use of multiplex diagnostic tests. The implementation of adaptive algorithms can predict better diagnosis and add value to the available RDTs. The web application of the model can serve as a tool to identify the optimal diagnostic algorithm in different epidemiological settings, while taking into account the local epidemiological variables and accuracy of available tests.en_US
dc.identifier.citationClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Vol.70, No.11 (2020), 2262-2269en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/cid/ciz665en_US
dc.identifier.issn15376591en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85082481680en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/58152
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85082481680&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleAlgorithm in the Diagnosis of Febrile Illness Using Pathogen-specific Rapid Diagnostic Testsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85082481680&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections