Publication:
Evaluating compliance with institutional preoperative testing guidelines for minimal-risk patients undergoing elective surgery

dc.contributor.authorArunotai Siriussawakulen_US
dc.contributor.authorAkarin Nimmanniten_US
dc.contributor.authorSirirat Rattana-Arpaen_US
dc.contributor.authorSiritda Chatrattanakulchaien_US
dc.contributor.authorPuttachard Saengtawanen_US
dc.contributor.authorAungsumat Wangdeeen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-19T04:37:11Z
dc.date.available2018-10-19T04:37:11Z
dc.date.issued2013-08-05en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground. Few investigations preoperatively are important for low-risk patients. This study was designed to determine the level of compliance with preoperative investigation guidelines for ASA I patients undergoing elective surgery. Secondary objectives included the following: to identify common inappropriate investigations, to evaluate the impact of abnormal testing on patient management, to determine factors affecting noncompliant tests, and to estimate unnecessary expenditure. Methods. This retrospective study was conducted on adult patients over a one-year period. The institute's guidelines recommend tests according to the patients' age groups: a complete blood count (CBC) for those patients aged 18-45; CBC, chest radiograph (CXR) and electrocardiography (ECG) for those aged 46-60; and CBC, CXR, ECG, electrolytes, blood glucose, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and creatinine (Cr) for patients aged 61-65. Results. The medical records of 1,496 patients were reviewed. Compliant testing was found in only 12.1% (95% CI, 10.5-13.9). BUN and Cr testings were the most frequently overprescribed tests. Overinvestigations tended to be performed on major surgery and younger patients. Overall, overinvestigation incurred an estimated cost of US 200,000 dollars during the study period. Conclusions. The need to utilize the institution's preoperative guidelines should be emphasized in order to decrease unnecessary testing and the consequential financial burden. © 2013 Arunotai Siriussawakul et al.en_US
dc.identifier.citationBioMed Research International. Vol.2013, (2013)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1155/2013/835426en_US
dc.identifier.issn23146141en_US
dc.identifier.issn23146133en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84880872461en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/31246
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84880872461&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biologyen_US
dc.subjectImmunology and Microbiologyen_US
dc.titleEvaluating compliance with institutional preoperative testing guidelines for minimal-risk patients undergoing elective surgeryen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84880872461&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections