Publication:
Rapid 500 mL albumin bolus versus rapid 200 mL bolus followed by slower continuous infusion in post-cardiac surgery patients: a pilot before-and-after study

dc.contributor.authorFumitaka Yanaseen_US
dc.contributor.authorThummaporn Naorungrojen_US
dc.contributor.authorSalvatore L. Cutulien_US
dc.contributor.authorGlenn M. Eastwooden_US
dc.contributor.authorRinaldo Bellomoen_US
dc.contributor.otherSiriraj Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherMelbourne Medical Schoolen_US
dc.contributor.otherFondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCSen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciencesen_US
dc.contributor.otherAustin Hospitalen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-04T09:21:24Z
dc.date.available2022-08-04T09:21:24Z
dc.date.issued2021-06-01en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: To evaluate the haemodynamic effects of rapid fluid bolus therapy (FBT) (500 mL of 4% albumin over several minutes) versus combined FBT (rapid 200 mL FBT followed by a 300 mL infusion over 30 minutes). Design: Single centre, prospective, before-and-after trial. Setting: A tertiary intensive care unit in Australia. Participants: Fifty mechanically ventilated post-cardiac surgery patients. Interventions: Rapid 4% albumin FBT versus combined FBT. Main outcome measures: We recorded haemodynamic parameters from before FBT to 30 minutes after FBT. A mean arterial pressure (MAP) response was defined by a MAP increase > 10%, and a cardiac index (CI) response was defined by a CI increase > 15%. Results: Immediately after rapid FBT versus combined FBT, there was a CI response in 13 patients (52%) compared with five patients (20%) respectively (P = 0.038), and a MAP response in 11 patients (44%) in each group. However, from FBT administration to 30 minutes, there was a time and group interaction such that MAP was higher in the rapid FBT group (P = 0.003), as was the case for central venous pressure (P = 0.002) and mean pulmonary artery pressure (P < 0.001). Body temperature fell immediately and was lower with rapid FBT but became warmer than with combined FBT later (P < 0.001). At 30 minutes, a MAP response was seen in ten patients (40%) compared with nine patients (36%) (P < 0.99) and a CI response was present in eight patients (32%) compared with 11 patients (44%) (P = 0.56) in the rapid versus combined FBT groups respectively. Conclusion: Rapid FBT was superior to combined FBT in terms of mean MAP levels and immediate CI response. However, the number of MAP responders or CI responders was similar at 30 minutes.en_US
dc.identifier.citationCritical Care and Resuscitation. Vol.23, No.3 (2021), 320-328en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.51893/2021.3.oa9en_US
dc.identifier.issn26529335en_US
dc.identifier.issn14412772en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85125814972en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/78126
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85125814972&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleRapid 500 mL albumin bolus versus rapid 200 mL bolus followed by slower continuous infusion in post-cardiac surgery patients: a pilot before-and-after studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85125814972&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections