Publication:
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of aprepitant versus two dosages of olanzapine with ondansetron plus dexamethasone for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients receiving high-emetogenic chemotherapy

dc.contributor.authorSuthinee Ithimakinen_US
dc.contributor.authorPathra Theeratrakulen_US
dc.contributor.authorApirom Laocharoenkiaten_US
dc.contributor.authorAkarin Nimmanniten_US
dc.contributor.authorCharuwan Akewanlopen_US
dc.contributor.authorNopadol Soparattanapaisarnen_US
dc.contributor.authorSirisopa Techawattanawannaen_US
dc.contributor.authorKrittiya Korphaisarnen_US
dc.contributor.authorPongwut Danchaivijitren_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T05:01:33Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T05:01:33Z
dc.date.issued2020-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2020, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature. Purpose: We assessed the efficacy of aprepitant (APR) or 10 or 5 mg OLN (OLN10 or OLN5) plus ondansetron and dexamethasone for chemotherapy-induced nausea/vomiting (CINV) prophylaxis in patients receiving high-emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC). Methods: Patients who received doxorubicin + cyclophosphamide or cisplatin were given intravenous ondansetron and dexamethasone prior to chemotherapy and oral dexamethasone on days 2–4 and randomized 1:1:1 to receive APR125 on day 1 and APR80 on days 2–3 or OLN10 or OLN5 on days 1–4. Matched placebo controls were used. The primary endpoint was no nausea in ≤ 120 h. Secondary endpoints included CINV severity, complete response (CR) rate, adverse effects (AE), and quality of life. Results: Of 141 patients, 104 received AC and 37 received cisplatin. The no-nausea rates were 33% (APR), 43.2% (OLN10; p = 0.24), and 37% (OLN5; p = 0.87). Grades 2–4 nausea were experienced by fewer patients for OLN10 than for APR (24–120 h, 8.7% vs. 27.7%, respectively; p = 0.02; overall period, 19.6% vs. 40.4%, respectively; p = 0.03). The median visual analog scale nausea score from 24 to 120 h was significantly lower for OLN10 (2.3) than for APR (1.2, p = 0.03). The degrees of vomiting, CR, and AE were similar between the APR and OLN10 groups. CINV was similar between the OLN5 and APR groups. Conclusions: Nausea was less severe for OLN10 than for APR in patients receiving HEC, but other measures were similar. CINV prevention efficacy was comparable between OLN5 and APR.en_US
dc.identifier.citationSupportive Care in Cancer. (2020)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00520-020-05380-6en_US
dc.identifier.issn14337339en_US
dc.identifier.issn09414355en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85081034214en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/53805
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85081034214&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleRandomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of aprepitant versus two dosages of olanzapine with ondansetron plus dexamethasone for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients receiving high-emetogenic chemotherapyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85081034214&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections