Publication:
Modeling and preliminary testing socket-residual limb interface stiffness of above-elbow prostheses

dc.contributor.authorJonathon W. Sensingeren_US
dc.contributor.authorRichard F Ff Weiren_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherRehabilitation Institute of Chicagoen_US
dc.contributor.otherJesse Brown VA Medical Centeren_US
dc.contributor.otherNorthwestern Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-12T02:19:10Z
dc.date.available2018-07-12T02:19:10Z
dc.date.issued2008-04-01en_US
dc.description.abstractThe interface between the socket and residual limb can have a significant effect on the performance of a prosthesis. Specifically, knowledge of the rotational stiffness of the socket-residual limb (S-RL) interface is extremely useful in designing new prostheses and evaluating new control paradigms, as well as in comparing existing and new socket technologies. No previous studies, however, have examined the rotational stiffness of S-RL interfaces. To address this problem, a math model is compared to a more complex finite element analysis, to see if the math model sufficiently captures the main effects of S-RL interface rotational stiffness. Both of these models are then compared to preliminary empirical testing, in which a series of X-rays, called fluoroscopy, is taken to obtain the movement of the bone relative to the socket. Force data are simultaneously recorded, and the combination of force and movement data are used to calculate the empirical rotational stiffness of elbow S-RL interface. The empirical rotational stiffness values are then compared to the models, to see if values of Young's modulus obtained in other studies at localized points may be used to determine the global rotational stiffness of the S-RL interface. Findings include agreement between the models and empirical results and the ability of persons to significantly modulate the rotational stiffness of their S-RL interface a little less than one order of magnitude. The floor and ceiling of this range depend significantly on socket length and co-contraction levels, but not on residual limb diameter or bone diameter. Measured trans-humeral S-RL interface rotational stiffness values ranged from 24-140 Nm/rad for the four subjects tested in this study. © 2006 IEEE.en_US
dc.identifier.citationIEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering. Vol.16, No.2 (2008), 184-190en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/TNSRE.2008.918388en_US
dc.identifier.issn15344320en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-42049092363en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/18945
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=42049092363&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biologyen_US
dc.subjectChemical Engineeringen_US
dc.subjectHealth Professionsen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleModeling and preliminary testing socket-residual limb interface stiffness of above-elbow prosthesesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=42049092363&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections