Publication:
The effect of baricity of intrathecal bupivacaine for elective cesarean delivery on maternal cardiac output: a randomized study

dc.contributor.authorP. Limratanaen_US
dc.contributor.authorT. Kiatchaien_US
dc.contributor.authorP. Somnukeen_US
dc.contributor.authorP. Prapakornen_US
dc.contributor.authorS. Suksompongen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-18T10:55:56Z
dc.date.available2020-11-18T10:55:56Z
dc.date.issued2020-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2020 Elsevier Ltd Background: Hemodynamic instability during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery is associated with adverse maternal and fetal outcomes. Plain and hyperbaric bupivacaine are commonly used for cesarean delivery, however, their distinctive pharmacologic properties may affect maternal hemodynamic profiles differently. The aim of this study was to compare hemodynamic profiles using a suprasternal Doppler cardiac output (CO) monitor in healthy term parturients randomized to receive plain or hyperbaric bupivacaine for cesarean delivery. Methods: One hundred sixty-eight healthy parturients scheduled for elective cesarean delivery were randomly assigned to receive 10.9 mg of intrathecal 0.5% plain or hyperbaric bupivacaine, both with 0.2 mg morphine. The primary outcome was CO change after spinal anesthesia. The Secondary outcomes were the incidence of hypotension, vasopressor use, and conversion to general anesthesia. Results: The mean (±SD) CO at baseline, 1 min and 5 min after spinal anesthesia, and after placental delivery was 4.6 ± 1.2, 5.4 ± 1.3, 5.1 ± 1.4, and 6.4 ± 1.7 L/min in the plain bupivacaine, and 4.5 ± 1.1, 5.2 ± 1.3, 4.9 ± 1.3, and 6.2 ± 1.9 L/min in the hyperbaric bupivacaine group. There were no significant differences in CO, mean arterial pressure, or systemic vascular resistance. Incidences of hypotension, vasopressor and supplemental analgesic use, and conversion to general anesthesia, were not different between groups. Conclusions: Cardiac output changes after plain or hyperbaric bupivacaine were not different in term parturients undergoing spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Further studies comparing block quality and the rate of conversion to general anesthesia are required.en_US
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia. (2020)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijoa.2020.07.011en_US
dc.identifier.issn15323374en_US
dc.identifier.issn0959289Xen_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85094629241en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/60098
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85094629241&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleThe effect of baricity of intrathecal bupivacaine for elective cesarean delivery on maternal cardiac output: a randomized studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85094629241&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections