Publication:
Recurrence outcome of lymph node ratio in gastric cancer after underwent curative resection: A retrospective cohort study

dc.contributor.authorChairat Supsamutchaien_US
dc.contributor.authorChumpon Wilasrusmeeen_US
dc.contributor.authorJakrapan Jirasirithamen_US
dc.contributor.authorTeerawut Rakchoben_US
dc.contributor.authorSongpol Phosuwanen_US
dc.contributor.authorTanet Chatmongkonwaten_US
dc.contributor.authorPattawia Choikruaen_US
dc.contributor.authorTharin Thampongsaen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-05T05:33:42Z
dc.date.available2020-05-05T05:33:42Z
dc.date.issued2020-06-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2020 The Authors Introduction: D2 dissection has been regarded as the standard procedure for locally advanced gastric cancer (GC). Number of lymph nodes (LN) harvested is an important factor for accurate staging. The number of LN retrieved and the metastasis LN status are also important factors to determine the prognosis. This study aims to evaluate whether lymph node ratio (LNR) could be a prognostic indicator of GC patients following curative resection. Patients and methods: Single center retrospective cohort study of GC patients underwent curative resection from January 1995 to December 2016 was conducted. The patients were categorized into 3 groups based on LNR (0.00–0.35, >0.35–0.75, and >0.75–1.00) and 2 groups based on number of LN retrieved (<15 and ≥ 15). Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate recurrence-free survival. Cox-regression were used to determine the association between LNR/other factors and the disease recurrence. Results: One-hundred fifty-three patients were included in analysis. Univariate analysis showed that LNR >0.35, pathologic LN stages (pN) 2–3, higher number of LN metastasis, and TNM stage III were significantly recurrence risk factors. After adjusting for several covariates, LNR >0.35 still was significant predictor (adjusted HR [95%CI], 8.53 [1.97, 36.86]; p = 0.004) while number of LN retrieved or number of metastasis LN were not. Conclusion: LNR could be a strong indicator for the recurrence of GC after curative resection while the number of LN retrieved or metastasis did not predict the recurrence. Future studies, such as prospective studies, are needed to confirm and identify the optimum LNR cut-off.en_US
dc.identifier.citationAnnals of Medicine and Surgery. Vol.54, (2020), 57-61en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.amsu.2020.04.002en_US
dc.identifier.issn20490801en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85083745938en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/54590
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85083745938&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleRecurrence outcome of lymph node ratio in gastric cancer after underwent curative resection: A retrospective cohort studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85083745938&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections