Publication:
A preliminary study of intranasal epinephrine administration as a potential route for anaphylaxis treatment

dc.contributor.authorChatchawan Srisawaten_US
dc.contributor.authorKanittha Nakponetongen_US
dc.contributor.authorPatchanee Benjasupattananunen_US
dc.contributor.authorChanthana Suratannonen_US
dc.contributor.authorLeatchai Wachirutmangguren_US
dc.contributor.authorSiribangon Boonchooen_US
dc.contributor.authorDuangjai Pankaewen_US
dc.contributor.authorApirom Laocharoenkiaten_US
dc.contributor.authorPunchama Pacharnen_US
dc.contributor.authorOrathai Jirapongsananuruken_US
dc.contributor.authorNualanong Visitsunthornen_US
dc.contributor.authorPakit Vichyanonden_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-11T03:04:35Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-14T08:01:47Z
dc.date.available2018-12-11T03:04:35Z
dc.date.available2019-03-14T08:01:47Z
dc.date.issued2016-03-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2016, Allergy and Immunology Society of Thailand. All rights reserved. Background: The intranasal (IN) administration of epinephrine could be an alternative route for anaphylaxis treatment. Although IN epinephrine absorption has been demonstrated in animals, such data in humans are still lacking. Objective: To study the pharmacokinetics of IN epinephrine absorption in humans. Methods: Each healthy adult (n=5) was administered IN saline, IN epinephrine at various doses (i.e., 0.3, 0.6, 1.25, 2.5 and 5 mg), and intramuscular (IM) epinephrine at 0.3 mg. Plasma epinephrine levels at baseline and various time points up to 120 minutes after administration were determined using highperformance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection. Results: Significant systemic absorption of epinephrine via IN route was observed only at the dose of 5 mg, and the absorption thereof was comparable to that of IM epinephrine; the average area-under-curve (AUC) values at 0-120 minutes for IN saline, IM epinephrine, and 5 mg IN epinephrine were 0.3, 18.3, and 19.4 ng.min/mL, respectively. In addition, the peak epinephrine concentrations and the time to reach them were also not significantly different between IM and 5-mg IN epinephrine; the corresponding values (mean ± SD) were 309 ± 88 pg/mL and 67 ± 43 min for IM epinephrine, and 386 ± 152 pg/mL and 70 ±17 min for 5 mg IN epinephrine. Conclusion: This preliminary study showed that epinephrine can be significantly absorbed via the IN route in humans. However, it requires a higher IN dose (5 mg) than the usual IM dose (0.3 mg) to achieve comparable systemic epinephrine absorption.en_US
dc.identifier.citationAsian Pacific Journal of Allergy and Immunology. Vol.34, No.1 (2016), 38-43en_US
dc.identifier.issn22288694en_US
dc.identifier.issn0125877Xen_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84962581899en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/40864
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84962581899&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectImmunology and Microbiologyen_US
dc.titleA preliminary study of intranasal epinephrine administration as a potential route for anaphylaxis treatmenten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84962581899&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections