Publication:
Prospects and strategies for malaria elimination in the Greater Mekong Sub-region: A qualitative study

dc.contributor.authorNils Kaehleren_US
dc.contributor.authorBipin Adhikarien_US
dc.contributor.authorPhaik Yeong Cheahen_US
dc.contributor.authorLorenz Von Seidleinen_US
dc.contributor.authorNicholas P.J. Dayen_US
dc.contributor.authorDaniel H. Parisen_US
dc.contributor.authorMarcel Tanneren_US
dc.contributor.authorChristopher Pellen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Oxforden_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversitat Baselen_US
dc.contributor.otherSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute (Swiss TPH)en_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherNuffield Department of Clinical Medicineen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversiteit van Amsterdamen_US
dc.contributor.otherAmsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development (AIGHD)en_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-27T08:56:36Z
dc.date.available2020-01-27T08:56:36Z
dc.date.issued2019-06-20en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2019 The Author(s). Background: As malaria elimination becomes a goal in malaria-endemic nations, questions of feasibility become critical. This article explores the potential challenges associated with this goal and future strategies for malaria elimination in the Greater Mekong Sub-region. Methods: Thirty-two semi-structured interviews were conducted with policy makers (n = 17) and principal investigators (n = 15) selected based on their involvement in malaria prevention, control and elimination in the GMS. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed for qualitative content (thematic) analysis using QSR NVivo. Results: All respondents described current malaria control and elimination strategies, such as case detection and management, prevention and strengthening of surveillance systems as critical and of equal priority. Aware of the emergence of multi-drug resistance in the GMS, researchers and policy makers outlined the need for additional elimination tools. As opposed to a centralized strategy, more targeted and tailored approaches to elimination were recommended. These included targeting endemic areas, consideration for local epidemiology and malaria species, and strengthening the peripheral health system. A decline in malaria transmission could lead to complacency amongst funders and policy makers resulting in a reduction or discontinuation of support for malaria elimination. Strong commitment of policymakers combined with strict monitoring and supervision by funders were considered pivotal to successful elimination programmes. Conclusion: Against a backdrop of increasing anti-malarial resistance and decreasing choices of anti-malarial regimens, policy makers and researchers stressed the urgency of finding new malaria elimination strategies. There was consensus that multi-pronged strategies and approaches are needed, that no single potential tool/strategy can be appropriate to all settings. Hence there is a need to customize malaria control and elimination strategies based on the better surveillance data.en_US
dc.identifier.citationMalaria Journal. Vol.18, No.1 (2019)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12936-019-2835-6en_US
dc.identifier.issn14752875en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85067579516en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/51053
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85067579516&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectImmunology and Microbiologyen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleProspects and strategies for malaria elimination in the Greater Mekong Sub-region: A qualitative studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85067579516&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections