Publication: Efficacy of levofloxacin as an antibacterial prophylaxis for acute leukemia patients receiving intensive chemotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Issued Date
2019-01-01
Resource Type
ISSN
16078454
10245332
10245332
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-85063274907
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Hematology (United Kingdom). Vol.24, No.1 (2019), 362-368
Suggested Citation
Weerapat Owattanapanich, Methee Chayakulkeeree Efficacy of levofloxacin as an antibacterial prophylaxis for acute leukemia patients receiving intensive chemotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hematology (United Kingdom). Vol.24, No.1 (2019), 362-368. doi:10.1080/16078454.2019.1589706 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/52135
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
Efficacy of levofloxacin as an antibacterial prophylaxis for acute leukemia patients receiving intensive chemotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Author(s)
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
© 2019, © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. Objectives: The incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) in acute leukemia patients following induction or consolidation chemotherapy is high. Several clinical practice guidelines recommend the use of a fluoroquinolone prophylaxis to prevent bacterial infection in patients being prone to prolonged profound neutropenia. Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the efficacy and complications of levofloxacin as a prophylaxis for FN patients following chemotherapy for acute leukemia. Two databases from MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for published studies indexed before 10 July 2018. Results: A total of 862 acute leukemia patients were included, with 356 in the levofloxacin prophylaxis arm and 506 in the no-prophylaxis arm. Patients receiving levofloxacin had a significantly lower FN rate than patients who did not receive the antibiotic prophylaxis (odds ratio [OR]: 0.43, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.32–0.58, p <.00001, I 2 = 0%). The rate of microbiologically documented infection in the no-prophylaxis group was higher than that for the levofloxacin prophylaxis group (OR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.34–0.60, p <.00001, I 2 = 0%). The bacteremia rate in the levofloxacin prophylaxis group was significantly lower than that for the no-prophylaxis group (OR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.31–0.66, p <.00001, I 2 = 0%). However, the mortality rates of the two groups were quite similar between the two groups (OR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.34–1.33, p =.26, I 2 = 0%). Conclusions: Although the levofloxacin prophylaxis for the acute leukemia patients receiving intensive chemotherapy showed advantages for infectious complications, it did not affect mortality.