Publication:
Identifying ‘hard-to-reach’ groups and strategies to engage them in biomedical research: Perspectives from engagement practitioners in southeast Asia [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]

dc.contributor.authorHa Nguyen Thanhen_US
dc.contributor.authorPhaik Yeong Cheahen_US
dc.contributor.authorMary Chambersen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Oxforden_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherNuffield Department of Clinical Medicineen_US
dc.contributor.otherGlobal Health Bioethics Networken_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-27T07:56:50Z
dc.date.available2020-01-27T07:56:50Z
dc.date.issued2019-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2019 Nguyen Thanh H et al. Public or community engagement (PE/CE) is an increasingly important component of biomedical research. However, PE/CE projects have been criticized for focusing on the ‘convenient sample’ populations that are more accessible and more likely to respond, thus missing out the less-socially visible groups. In January 2018, engagement practitioners from across Southeast Asia, attending a regional workshop, undertook a discussion about the ‘hard-to-reach’ populations in the region, and how PE projects can better engage them. This paper is a summary of that discussion. After an initial brainstorming exercise the hard-to-reach populations identified by workshop participants were broadly categorised into three groups: Urban poor, ethnic minority groups and children in rural primary schools. Delegates identified common characteristics of the populations and possible interventions to reach them. Notes of the discussions were used as data for the report. Four common issues that become barriers for engagement were identified: (1) financial instability; (2) mobility in residency and work; (3) discrimination and isolation; and (4) limitations in local resources. It is important to recognise that a group might be more disadvantaged by one factor than the others, but often these issues inter-relate to restrict outreach. In order to engage these populations, a tailor-made programme, that suits the local context, should be created. This can be done through four strategies that have the acronym ‘FIND’: (1) F ormative research to improve understanding of the population; (2) I ntegrating into local life; (3) Networking with relevant stakeholders; and (4) Developing local resources. Our discussion highlights the importance of a deep understanding of the local contexts in order to implement relevant and acceptable engagement projects. Findings from this report may be useful for planning public engagement projects in similar settings.en_US
dc.identifier.citationWellcome Open Research. Vol.4, (2019)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15326.1en_US
dc.identifier.issn2398502Xen_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85075365679en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/50374
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85075365679&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biologyen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleIdentifying ‘hard-to-reach’ groups and strategies to engage them in biomedical research: Perspectives from engagement practitioners in southeast Asia [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]en_US
dc.typeLetteren_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85075365679&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections