Publication:
Biosafety and Biosecurity Challenges Facing Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratories in Lower-Middle Income Countries in Southeast Asia: A Case Study of Thailand

dc.contributor.authorJarunee Siengsanan-Lamonten_US
dc.contributor.authorSomjai Kamolsiripichaipornen_US
dc.contributor.authorSoiratchaneekorn Ruanchaimunen_US
dc.contributor.authorTuangthong Patchimasirien_US
dc.contributor.authorBanjong Jongrakwattanaen_US
dc.contributor.authorStuart D. Blacksellen_US
dc.contributor.otherThailand National Institute of Animal Healthen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherNuffield Department of Clinical Medicineen_US
dc.contributor.otherAnimal Health and Laboratory Consultanten_US
dc.contributor.otherAnimal Health and Laboratory Consultanten_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-27T07:35:07Z
dc.date.available2020-01-27T07:35:07Z
dc.date.issued2019-12-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© ABSA International 2019. Introduction: Global concerns over emerging and transboundary infectious zoonotic diseases have increased disease diagnostic demands, especially in the veterinary sector. In developing or newly developed countries where the sector often works under limited capacity, biosafety and biosecurity are unlikely to be high-priority issues. A recent development program supported by the Biological Threat Reduction Program of the Defense Threat Reduction Agency funded by the US government aimed to increase biosafety and biosecurity measures of government veterinary diagnostic and research laboratories in Thailand. Objective: The purpose of this article is to identify biosafety and biosecurity challenges, opportunities, and recommendations. Methods: Eleven government laboratory centers were assessed against the Biosafety in Microbiological and Biomedical Laboratories (BMBL) biosafety level 2 (BSL-2) requirements checklist. The BMBL assessment outcomes were then combined with the outcomes of discussion sessions, and the results of pre- and post-test questionnaires conducted during biosafety assessment workshops and self-evaluation reports using the Food and Agriculture Organization Biosafety Laboratory Mapping Tool of each laboratory center were reviewed and summarized. Results: Despite established national policies on laboratory biosafety and biosecurity, major challenges included (1) harmonization and enforcement of these policies, especially at the regional level, and (2) engagement of personnel in implementations of biosafety and biosecurity measures. Conclusion: Consistent biosafety policy and allocated resources together with regular training are required to develop sustainable biosafety and biosecurity at the national level. Collaboration between regional countries, international organizations, and donors is essential for improving biosafety and biosecurity on a global scale through setting regional priorities, enacting regulatory standards, and providing technical and financial support.en_US
dc.identifier.citationApplied Biosafety. Vol.24, No.4 (2019), 220-230en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1535676019869771en_US
dc.identifier.issn24701246en_US
dc.identifier.issn15356760en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85071455804en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/50016
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85071455804&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biologyen_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental Scienceen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleBiosafety and Biosecurity Challenges Facing Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratories in Lower-Middle Income Countries in Southeast Asia: A Case Study of Thailanden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85071455804&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections