Publication: Scrub typhus point-of-care testing: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Issued Date
2018-03-26
Resource Type
ISSN
19352735
19352727
19352727
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-85045079410
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases. Vol.12, No.3 (2018)
Suggested Citation
Kartika Saraswati, Nicholas P.J. Day, Mavuto Mukaka, Stuart D. Blacksell Scrub typhus point-of-care testing: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases. Vol.12, No.3 (2018). doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0006330 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/46822
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
Scrub typhus point-of-care testing: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
© 2018 Saraswati et al. Background: Diagnosing scrub typhus clinically is difficult, hence laboratory tests play a very important role in diagnosis. As performing sophisticated laboratory tests in resource-limited settings is not feasible, accurate point-of-care testing (POCT) for scrub typhus diagnosis would be invaluable for patient diagnosis and management. Here we summarise the existing evidence on the accuracy of scrub typhus POCTs to inform clinical practitioners in resource-limited settings of their diagnostic value. Methodology/principal findings: Studies on POCTs which can be feasibly deployed in primary health care or outpatient settings were included. Thirty-one studies were identified through PubMed and manual searches of reference lists. The quality of the studies was assessed with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2). About half (n = 14/31) of the included studies were of moderate quality. Meta-analysis showed the pooled sensitivity and specificity of commercially available immunochromatographic tests (ICTs) were 66.0% (95% CI 0.37–0.86) and 92.0% (95% CI 0.83–0.97), respectively. There was a significant and high degree of heterogeneity between the studies (I2value = 97.48%, 95% CI 96.71–98.24 for sensitivity and I2value = 98.17%, 95% CI 97.67–98.67 for specificity). Significant heterogeneity was observed for total number of samples between studies (p = 0.01), study design (whether using case-control design or not, p = 0.01), blinding during index test interpretation (p = 0.02), and QUADAS-2 score (p = 0.01). Conclusions/significance: There was significant heterogeneity between the scrub typhus POCT diagnostic accuracy studies examined. Overall, the commercially available scrub typhus ICTs demonstrated better performance when ‘ruling in’ the diagnosis. There is a need for standardised methods and reporting of diagnostic accuracy to decrease between-study heterogeneity and increase comparability among study results, as well as development of an affordable and accurate antigen-based POCT to tackle the inherent weaknesses associated with serological testing.