Publication:
MRI classification of interspinous ligament degeneration of the lumbar spine: Intraobserver and interobserver reliability and the frequency of disagreement

dc.contributor.authorGun Keorochanaen_US
dc.contributor.authorCyrus E. Taghavien_US
dc.contributor.authorShiau Tzu Tzengen_US
dc.contributor.authorKwang Bok Leeen_US
dc.contributor.authorJen Chung Liaoen_US
dc.contributor.authorJeong Hyun Yooen_US
dc.contributor.authorJeffrey C. Wangen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of California, Los Angelesen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-24T09:20:34Z
dc.date.available2018-09-24T09:20:34Z
dc.date.issued2010-10-01en_US
dc.description.abstractPosterior spinal ligament pathology is becoming increasingly recognized as a significant cause of low back pain. Despite the growing clinical importance of interspinous ligament degeneration in low back pain patients, formal reliability studies for the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluation of interspinous ligaments have not been performed. We proposed an MRI classification system for interspinous ligament degeneration and conducted a comprehensive reliability and reproducibility assessment. Fifty patients who had low back pain with or without leg discomfort (26 males and 24 females) with a mean age of 48.8 years (range 23-85 years) were studied. The classification for lumbar interspinous ligament degeneration was developed on the basis of the literature using mid-sagittal T1- and T2-weighted images. Three spine surgeons independently graded a total of 200 interspinous ligament levels. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability were assessed by kappa statistics. The frequency of disagreement was also identified. The intraobserver agreement was excellent in all readers (kappa range 0.840-0.901). The interobserver agreement was lower as expected, and was substantial to excellent (kappa range 0.726-0.818). Overall complete agreement was obtained in 87.8% of all interspinous ligament levels. A difference of 1, 2, and 3 grades occurred in 8.1, 3.0, and 1.1% of readings, respectively. This proposed MRI classification of interspinous ligament degeneration was simple, reliable, and reproducible. Its use as a standardized nomenclature in clinical and radiographic research may be recommended. © 2010 The Author(s).en_US
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Spine Journal. Vol.19, No.10 (2010), 1740-1745en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00586-010-1327-8en_US
dc.identifier.issn09406719en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-78349311367en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/29518
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=78349311367&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleMRI classification of interspinous ligament degeneration of the lumbar spine: Intraobserver and interobserver reliability and the frequency of disagreementen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=78349311367&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections