Publication:
Evaluation of consensus method for the culture of Burkholderia pseudomallei in soil samples from Laos [version 2; referees: 2 approved]

dc.contributor.authorDavid A.B. Danceen_US
dc.contributor.authorMichael Knappiken_US
dc.contributor.authorSabine Dittrichen_US
dc.contributor.authorViengmon Davongen_US
dc.contributor.authorJoy Silisouken_US
dc.contributor.authorManivanh Vongsouvathen_US
dc.contributor.authorSayaphet Rattanavongen_US
dc.contributor.authorAlain Pierreten_US
dc.contributor.authorPaul N. Newtonen_US
dc.contributor.authorPremjit Amornchaien_US
dc.contributor.authorVanaporn Wuthiekanunen_US
dc.contributor.authorSayan Langlaen_US
dc.contributor.authorDirek Limmathurotsakulen_US
dc.contributor.otherLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicineen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Oxforden_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherFoundation for Innovative and New Diagnostics (FIND)en_US
dc.contributor.otherUPMC Univ Paris 06en_US
dc.contributor.otherMahosot Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherMédecins Sans Frontièresen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-23T10:41:38Z
dc.date.available2019-08-23T10:41:38Z
dc.date.issued2018-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2018 Dance DAB et al. Background: We have previously shown that PCR following enrichment culture is the most sensitive method to detect Burkholderia pseudomallei in environmental samples. Here we report an evaluation of the published consensus method for the culture of B. pseudomallei from Lao soil in comparison with our conventional culture method and with PCR with or without prior broth enrichment. Methods: One hundred soil samples were collected from a field known to contain B. pseudomallei and processed by: (i) the conventional method, (ii-iii) the consensus method using media prepared in either Laos or Thailand, and (iv) the consensus method performed in Thailand, as well as by (v) PCR following direct extraction of DNA from soil and (vi) PCR following broth pre-enrichment. Results: The numbers of samples in which B. pseudomallei was detected were 42, 10, 7, 6, 6 and 84, respectively. However, two samples were positive by the consensus method but negative by conventional culture, and one sample was negative by PCR following enrichment although B. pseudomallei was isolated by the conventional culture method. Conclusions/Discussion: The results show that no single method will detect all environmental samples that contain B. pseudomallei. People conducting environmental surveys for this organism should be aware of the possibility of false-negative results using the consensus culture method. An approach that entails screening using PCR after enrichment, followed by the evaluation of a range of different culture methods on PCR-positive samples to determine which works best in each setting, is recommended.en_US
dc.identifier.citationWellcome Open Research. Vol.3, (2018)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.12688/wellcomeopenres.14851.2en_US
dc.identifier.issn2398502Xen_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85063035358en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/45335
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85063035358&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biologyen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of consensus method for the culture of Burkholderia pseudomallei in soil samples from Laos [version 2; referees: 2 approved]en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85063035358&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections