Publication:
Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Cost Effectiveness of a Ready-to-Use Applicator Containing Iodine Povacrylex and Isopropyl Alcohol Compared with Conventional Skin Scrubbing and Painting in Patients Undergoing Colorectal Surgery

dc.contributor.authorPariyada Tanjaken_US
dc.contributor.authorBenjarat Thiengtrongen_US
dc.contributor.authorDarin Lohsiriwaten_US
dc.contributor.authorVarut Lohsen_US
dc.contributor.authorAmorn Leelaratsameeen_US
dc.contributor.authorVitoon Chinswangwatanakulen_US
dc.contributor.otherSiriraj Hospitalen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-04T11:06:23Z
dc.date.available2022-08-04T11:06:23Z
dc.date.issued2021-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a ready-to-use applicator containing iodine povacrylex and isopropyl alcohol (IPIA) for the prevention of surgical site infection (SSI) following colorectal surgery. Materials and Methods: The IPIA was randomly used in patients who underwent colorectal surgical procedures. The control group for comparison was a group of patients who underwent colorectal surgical procedures using conventional skin scrubbing and painting with antiseptic solutions without IPIA. In total, 100 patients were included in the study, randomized into 2 groups: IPIA was applied in study group and convention skin preparation was applied in control group.The outcome measurements included ease-of-use as assessed by a questionnaire, preparation time comparison, estimated skin preparation expense, adverse reactions, and rate of SSI. All the patients were visited daily up to 7 days postoperation or until discharge, and then 14 and 30 days postoperatively for monitoring the occurrence of SSI. Results: Of the 100 patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery enrolled in the study, 51 were males and 49 females, with the mean age of 63.5 ± 11.3 years. The majority of the patients had colorectal cancer undergone colectomies or rectal resections. There was no mortality. Seven patients (7%) had postoperative SSI (4 patients in the control group and 3 patients in the IPIA group, 8% vs. 6%, p = 0.45). The bacterial cultures revealed Gram negative-bacilli in all of the patients with SSI. The preparation time for the skin preparation was 5.48 ± 2.49 min in the control group and 2.65 ± 1.55 min in the IPIA group (p = 0.002), without statistical significance of expenses. Conclusion: IPIA was demonstrated to be as safe and effective as conventional antiseptic solutions as a skin preparation to prevent SSI following colorectal surgery. With good ease of use, IPIA proved more convenient than a scrubbing preparation as well as offered better cost effectiveness by significantly reducing the time and cost of the skin preparation.en_US
dc.identifier.citationSiriraj Medical Journal. Vol.73, No.9 (2021), 570-575en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.33192/Smj.2021.74en_US
dc.identifier.issn22288082en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85114794671en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/78620
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85114794671&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleRandomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Cost Effectiveness of a Ready-to-Use Applicator Containing Iodine Povacrylex and Isopropyl Alcohol Compared with Conventional Skin Scrubbing and Painting in Patients Undergoing Colorectal Surgeryen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85114794671&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections