Publication: What is the yield of malaria reactive case detection in the Greater Mekong Sub-region? A review of published data and meta-analysis
dc.contributor.author | Jacqueline Deen | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Mavuto Mukaka | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Lorenz von Seidlein | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | National Institutes of Health, University of the Philippines Manila | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | Nuffield Department of Medicine | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-08-04T08:46:40Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-08-04T08:46:40Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-12-01 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Reactive malaria case detection involves the screening of those in contact with index cases and is used in countries in the Greater Mekong Sub-region. The yield of reactive case detection, defined here as the percentage of positive malaria cases among potential contacts who were screened, was assessed. Methods: A literature search was conducted on PubMed to identify studies on reactive case detection in the Greater Mekong Sub-region. Eligible published articles were reviewed and pooled estimates from the studies were calculated, by type of malaria test used. Results: Eighty-five publications were retrieved, of which 8 (9.4%) eligible articles were included in the analysis. The yield from reactive case detection ranged from 0.1 to 4.2%, with higher rates from PCR testing compared with microscopy and/or rapid diagnostic test. The overall yield from microscopy and/or rapid diagnostic test was 0.56% (95% CI 0.31–0.88%), while that from PCR was 2.35% (95% CI 1.19–3.87%). The two studies comparing different target groups showed higher yield from co-workers/co-travellers, compared with household contacts. Conclusion: In low malaria transmission settings, the effectiveness of reactive case detection is diminishing. In the Greater Mekong Sub-region, modifying reactive case detection from household contacts to co-workers/co-travellers and from testing to presumptive treatment of targeted contacts, could increase the impact of this approach. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Malaria Journal. Vol.20, No.1 (2021) | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1186/s12936-021-03667-5 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 14752875 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | 2-s2.0-85101982077 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/77182 | |
dc.rights | Mahidol University | en_US |
dc.rights.holder | SCOPUS | en_US |
dc.source.uri | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85101982077&origin=inward | en_US |
dc.subject | Immunology and Microbiology | en_US |
dc.subject | Medicine | en_US |
dc.title | What is the yield of malaria reactive case detection in the Greater Mekong Sub-region? A review of published data and meta-analysis | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
mu.datasource.scopus | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85101982077&origin=inward | en_US |