Publication:
What is the yield of malaria reactive case detection in the Greater Mekong Sub-region? A review of published data and meta-analysis

dc.contributor.authorJacqueline Deenen_US
dc.contributor.authorMavuto Mukakaen_US
dc.contributor.authorLorenz von Seidleinen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherNational Institutes of Health, University of the Philippines Manilaen_US
dc.contributor.otherNuffield Department of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-04T08:46:40Z
dc.date.available2022-08-04T08:46:40Z
dc.date.issued2021-12-01en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Reactive malaria case detection involves the screening of those in contact with index cases and is used in countries in the Greater Mekong Sub-region. The yield of reactive case detection, defined here as the percentage of positive malaria cases among potential contacts who were screened, was assessed. Methods: A literature search was conducted on PubMed to identify studies on reactive case detection in the Greater Mekong Sub-region. Eligible published articles were reviewed and pooled estimates from the studies were calculated, by type of malaria test used. Results: Eighty-five publications were retrieved, of which 8 (9.4%) eligible articles were included in the analysis. The yield from reactive case detection ranged from 0.1 to 4.2%, with higher rates from PCR testing compared with microscopy and/or rapid diagnostic test. The overall yield from microscopy and/or rapid diagnostic test was 0.56% (95% CI 0.31–0.88%), while that from PCR was 2.35% (95% CI 1.19–3.87%). The two studies comparing different target groups showed higher yield from co-workers/co-travellers, compared with household contacts. Conclusion: In low malaria transmission settings, the effectiveness of reactive case detection is diminishing. In the Greater Mekong Sub-region, modifying reactive case detection from household contacts to co-workers/co-travellers and from testing to presumptive treatment of targeted contacts, could increase the impact of this approach.en_US
dc.identifier.citationMalaria Journal. Vol.20, No.1 (2021)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12936-021-03667-5en_US
dc.identifier.issn14752875en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85101982077en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/77182
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85101982077&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectImmunology and Microbiologyen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleWhat is the yield of malaria reactive case detection in the Greater Mekong Sub-region? A review of published data and meta-analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85101982077&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections