Publication:
Prognostic indicators for failed nonsurgical reduction of intussusception

dc.contributor.authorJiraporn Khoranaen_US
dc.contributor.authorJesda Singhavejsakulen_US
dc.contributor.authorNuthapong Ukarapolen_US
dc.contributor.authorMongkol Laohapensangen_US
dc.contributor.authorJakraphan Siriwongmongkolen_US
dc.contributor.authorJayanton Patumanonden_US
dc.contributor.otherChiang Mai Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherThammasat University Hospitalen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-11T02:29:11Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-14T08:04:24Z
dc.date.available2018-12-11T02:29:11Z
dc.date.available2019-03-14T08:04:24Z
dc.date.issued2016-08-09en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2016 Khorana et al. Purpose: To identify the risk factors for failure of nonsurgical reduction of intussusception. Methods: Data from intussusception patients who were treated with nonsurgical reduction in Chiang Mai University Hospital and Siriraj Hospital between January 2006 and December 2012 were collected. Patients aged 0-15 years and without contraindications (peritonitis, abdominal X-ray signs of perforation, and/or hemodynamic instability) were included for nonsurgical reduction. The success and failure groups were divided according to the results of the reduction. Prognostic indicators for failed reduction were identified by using generalized linear model for exponential risk regression. The risk ratio (RR) was used to report each factor. Results: One hundred and ninety cases of intussusception were enrolled. Twenty cases were excluded due to contraindications. A total of 170 cases of intussusception were included for the final analysis. The significant risk factors for reduction failure clustered by an age of 3 years were weight <12 kg (RR =1.48, P=0.004), symptom duration >3 days (RR =1.26, P<0.001), vomiting (RR =1.63, P<0.001), rectal bleeding (RR =1.50, P<0.001), abdominal distension (RR =1.60, P=0.003), temperature >37.8°C (RR =1.51, P<0.001), palpable abdominal mass (RR =1.26, P<0.001), location of mass (left over right side) (RR =1.48, P<0.001), poor prognostic signs on ultrasound scans (RR =1.35, P<0.001), and method of reduction (hydrostatic over pneumatic) (RR =1.34, P=0.023). The prediction ability of this model was 82.21% as assessed from the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Conclusion: The identified prognostic factors for the nonsurgical reduction failure may help to predict the reduction outcome and provide information to the parents.en_US
dc.identifier.citationTherapeutics and Clinical Risk Management. Vol.12, (2016), 1231-1237en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.2147/TCRM.S109785en_US
dc.identifier.issn1178203Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn11766336en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84983552134en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/43342
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84983552134&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectChemical Engineeringen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titlePrognostic indicators for failed nonsurgical reduction of intussusceptionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84983552134&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections