Publication:
Comparative pharmacodynamics of four different carbapenems in combination with polymyxin B against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii

dc.contributor.authorJustin R. Lenharden_US
dc.contributor.authorJonathan S. Gallen_US
dc.contributor.authorJurgen B. Bulittaen_US
dc.contributor.authorVisanu Thamlikitkulen_US
dc.contributor.authorCornelia B. Landersdorferen_US
dc.contributor.authorAlan Forresten_US
dc.contributor.authorRoger L. Nationen_US
dc.contributor.authorJian Lien_US
dc.contributor.authorBrian T. Tsujien_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New Yorken_US
dc.contributor.otherCalifornia Northstate University College of Pharmacyen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Floridaen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherMonash Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherThe University of North Carolina at Chapel Hillen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-11T03:16:19Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-14T08:01:56Z
dc.date.available2018-12-11T03:16:19Z
dc.date.available2019-03-14T08:01:56Z
dc.date.issued2016-12-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2016 The objective of this study was to determine the comparative pharmacodynamics of four different carbapenems in combination with polymyxin B (PMB) against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolates using time–kill experiments at two different inocula. Two A. baumannii strains (03-149-1 and N16870) with carbapenem minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) ranging from 8 to 64 mg/L were investigated in 48-h time–kill experiments using starting inocula of 106 CFU/mL and 108 CFU/mL. Concentration arrays of ertapenem, doripenem, meropenem and imipenem at 0.25×, 0.5×, 1×, 1.5× and 2× published maximum serum concentration (Cmax) values (Cmaxconcentrations of 12, 21, 48 and 60 mg/L, respectively) were investigated in the presence of 1.5 mg/L PMB. Use of carbapenems without PMB resulted in drastic re-growth. All carbapenem combinations were able to achieve a ≥3 log10CFU/mL reduction by 4 h against both strains at 106 CFU/mL, whereas maximum reductions against strain 03-149-1 at 108 CFU/mL were 1.0, 3.2, 2.2 and 3.3 log10CFU/mL for ertapenem, doripenem, meropenem and imipenem, respectively. None of the combinations were capable of reducing 108 CFU/mL of N16870 by ≥2 log10CFU/mL. Ertapenem combinations consistently displayed the least activity, whereas doripenem, meropenem and imipenem combinations had similar activities that were poorly predicted by carbapenem MICs. As doripenem, meropenem, or imipenem displayed similar pharmacodyanmics in combination, the decision of which carbapenem to use in combination with PMB may be based on toxicodynamic profiles if drastic discordance in MICs is not present.en_US
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Antimicrobial Agents. Vol.48, No.6 (2016), 719-724en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2016.07.024en_US
dc.identifier.issn18727913en_US
dc.identifier.issn09248579en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85001052610en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/40993
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85001052610&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleComparative pharmacodynamics of four different carbapenems in combination with polymyxin B against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumanniien_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85001052610&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections