Publication: Photoelastic stress analysis of external versus internal implant-abutment connections
dc.contributor.author | Pattapon Asvanund | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Steven M. Morgano | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | Mahidol University | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | Boston University | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-05-03T08:09:54Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-05-03T08:09:54Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2011-10-01 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Common complications of implant restorations are abutment screw loosening and screw fracture. The geometry of the implant-abutment connection may affect stresses generated from loading, and these stresses may have a role in screw loosening or fracture. This study compared the load transfer characteristics of a complete-arch restoration supported by 4 implants with external and internal implant-abutment connections. Loads were applied to the prostheses in 3 positions. Two-dimensional photoelastic models were used to simulate bone. Two types of implants (ReplaceSelect Internal-Interface Tapered Implants and ReplaceSelect External-Interface Tapered Implants) were placed in the photoelastic models. Complete-arch metal frameworks were fabricated on the abutments. Artificial teeth were arranged on the framework, and the prosthesis was screwed onto the abutments. The specimens were analyzed at 2 levels (implant-abutment level and apical to the implant level) with 3 loading conditions (4-point load; 2-point anterior load; and 2-point lateral load). The numbers of fringe orders were recorded and compared. With the 4-point load, no stress differences occurred between the external-implant abutment connection and internal-implant abutment connection at the connection level and at the apical level. With the 2-point anterior load, the internal-implant abutment connection resulted in lower stresses at the connection level both in the loaded and non-loaded areas. With the 2-point lateral load, the internal-implant abutment connection resulted in lower stresses at the connection level at the non-loaded area. When loaded off-center, the internal-implant abutment connection produced less stress when compared with the external-implant abutment connection. © 2011 The Editorial Council of the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. Vol.106, No.4 (2011), 266-271 | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60128-5 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 00223913 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | 2-s2.0-80053345427 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/11821 | |
dc.rights | Mahidol University | en_US |
dc.rights.holder | SCOPUS | en_US |
dc.source.uri | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=80053345427&origin=inward | en_US |
dc.subject | Dentistry | en_US |
dc.title | Photoelastic stress analysis of external versus internal implant-abutment connections | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
mu.datasource.scopus | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=80053345427&origin=inward | en_US |