Publication: Evaluation and utility of mitochondrial ribosomal genes for molecular systematics of parasitic nematodes
Issued Date
2020-07-20
Resource Type
ISSN
17563305
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-85088351353
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Parasites and Vectors. Vol.13, No.1 (2020)
Suggested Citation
Abigail Hui En Chan, Kittipong Chaisiri, Serge Morand, Naowarat Saralamba, Urusa Thaenkham Evaluation and utility of mitochondrial ribosomal genes for molecular systematics of parasitic nematodes. Parasites and Vectors. Vol.13, No.1 (2020). doi:10.1186/s13071-020-04242-8 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/57948
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
Evaluation and utility of mitochondrial ribosomal genes for molecular systematics of parasitic nematodes
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
© 2020 The Author(s). Background: Molecular advances have accelerated our understanding of nematode systematics and taxonomy. However, comparative analyzes between various genetic markers have led to discrepancies in nematode phylogenies. This study aimed to evaluate the suitability of using mitochondrial 12S and 16S ribosomal RNA genes for nematode molecular systematics. Methods: To study the suitability of mitochondrial 12S and 16S ribosomal RNA genes as genetic markers for nematode molecular systematics, we compared them with the other commonly used genetic markers, nuclear internal transcribed spacer 1 and 2 regions, nuclear 18S and 28S ribosomal RNA genes, and mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 gene. After that, phylum-wide primers for mitochondrial 12S and 16S ribosomal RNA genes were designed, and parasitic nematodes of humans and animals from 75 taxa with 21 representative species were inferred through phylogenetic analyzes. Phylogenetic analyzes were carried out using maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference algorithms. Results: The phylogenetic relationships of nematodes based on the mitochondrial 12S rRNA gene supported the monophyly of nematodes in clades I, IV, and V, reinforcing the potential of this gene as a genetic marker for nematode systematics. In contrast, the mitochondrial 16S rRNA gene only supported the monophyly of clades I and V, providing evidence that the 12S rRNA gene is more suitable for nematode molecular systematics. In this study, subclades of clade III containing various nematode families were not monophyletic when the 16S or 12S rRNA gene was used as the genetic marker. This is similar to the phylogenetic relationship revealed by previous studies using whole mitochondrial genomes as genetic markers. Conclusions: This study supports the use of the 12S rRNA gene as a genetic marker for studying the molecular systematics of nematodes to understand intra-phyla relationships. Phylum-wide primers for nematodes using mitochondrial ribosomal genes were prepared, which may enhance future studies. Furthermore, sufficient genetic variation in the mitochondrial 12S and 16S rRNA genes between species also allowed for accurate taxonomy to species level, revealing the potential of these two genes as genetic markers for DNA barcoding.[Figure not available: see fulltext.]