Publication:
Critical evaluation of web-based DNA N6-methyladenine site prediction tools

dc.contributor.authorMd Mehedi Hasanen_US
dc.contributor.authorWatshara Shoombuatongen_US
dc.contributor.authorHiroyuki Kurataen_US
dc.contributor.authorBalachandran Manavalanen_US
dc.contributor.otherKyushu Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.contributor.otherAjou University School of Medicineen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-04T08:08:15Z
dc.date.available2022-08-04T08:08:15Z
dc.date.issued2021-07-01en_US
dc.description.abstractMethylation of DNA N6-methyladenosine (6mA) is a type of epigenetic modification that plays pivotal roles in various biological processes. The accurate genome-wide identification of 6mA is a challenging task that leads to understanding the biological functions. For the last 5 years, a number of bioinformatics approaches and tools for 6mA site prediction have been established, and some of them are easily accessible as web application. Nevertheless, the accurate genome-wide identification of 6mA is still one of the challenging works that lead to understanding the biological functions. Especially in practical applications, these tools have implemented diverse encoding schemes, machine learning algorithms and feature selection methods, whereas few systematic performance comparisons of 6mA site predictors have been reported. In this review, 11 publicly available 6mA predictors evaluated with seven different species-specific datasets (Arabidopsis thaliana, Tolypocladium, Diospyros lotus, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Drosophila melanogaster, Caenorhabditis elegans and Escherichia coli). Of those, few species are close homologs, and the remaining datasets are distant sequences. Our independent, validation tests demonstrated that Meta-i6mA and MM-6mAPred models for A. thaliana, Tolypocladium, S. cerevisiae and D. melanogaster achieved excellent overall performance when compared with their counterparts. However, none of the existing methods were suitable for E. coli, C. elegans and D. lotus. A feasibility of the existing predictors is also discussed for the seven species. Our evaluation provides useful guidelines for the development of 6mA site predictors and helps biologists selecting suitable prediction tools.en_US
dc.identifier.citationBriefings in Functional Genomics. Vol.20, No.4 (2021), 258-272en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/bfgp/elaa028en_US
dc.identifier.issn20412657en_US
dc.identifier.issn20412649en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85100938416en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/76134
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85100938416&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biologyen_US
dc.titleCritical evaluation of web-based DNA N6-methyladenine site prediction toolsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85100938416&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections