Publication:
Long-term outcomes of intended undercorrection intraocular lens implantation in pediatric cataract

dc.contributor.authorApatsa Lekskulen_US
dc.contributor.authorPichaya Chuephanichen_US
dc.contributor.authorChao Charoenkijkajornen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-28T06:30:00Z
dc.date.available2019-08-28T06:30:00Z
dc.date.issued2018-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2018 Lekskul et al. Purpose: To evaluate the postoperative refraction of intended undercorrection after intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in pediatric cataract patients. Design: A cross-sectional study (data collected by retrospective chart review). Patients and methods: The medical records of children aged under 10 years, who underwent cataract surgery with IOL implantation at the Ramathibodi Hospital between January 2000 and May 2018, were reviewed. IOL power calculations were 30%, 25%, 20%, 15% and 10% under-corrected if children were aged 6–12, 13–24, 25–36, 37–48 and 49–60 months, respectively. Two diopters (D) undercorrection was used in children aged between 5 and 8 years and one diopter undercorrection was used in children aged between 8 and 10 years. The main outcome measure was the postoperative refractive errors at the last follow-up visit. Results: In total, 50 children (21 females and 29 males, 16 unilateral and 34 bilateral, 84 eyes) met the inclusion criteria for this study. Mean age at the time of surgery was 77.82±31.24 months. Mean follow-up time was 56.56±45.83 months. The main outcome in this study was the postoperative refractive error in children aged 7 years or more. We found 74 eyes of 44 children who were aged 7 years or more at last follow-up visit. In total, 45 eyes were myopic (−0.25 to −8.25 D) with a mean refraction of −2.26±2.16 D. A further 21 eyes were hyperopic (+0.25 to +3.25 D), with a mean refraction of +1.05±0.79 D and eight eyes were emmetropic or having only astigmatism. Conclusion: The major postoperative refractive error at the last follow-up time was myopia. We have to adjust the IOL calculation formula to specify more undercorrection, with the aim of achieving more optimal refractive outcomes in adulthood.en_US
dc.identifier.citationClinical Ophthalmology. Vol.12, (2018), 1905-1911en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.2147/OPTH.S176057en_US
dc.identifier.issn11775483en_US
dc.identifier.issn11775467en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85057764607en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/47051
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85057764607&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleLong-term outcomes of intended undercorrection intraocular lens implantation in pediatric cataracten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85057764607&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections