Publication:
The consequences of AMR education and awareness raising: Outputs, outcomes, and behavioural impacts of an antibiotic-related educational activity in lao PDR

dc.contributor.authorMarco J. Haenssgenen_US
dc.contributor.authorThipphaphone Xayavongen_US
dc.contributor.authorNutcha Charoenboonen_US
dc.contributor.authorPenporn Warapikuptanunen_US
dc.contributor.authorYuzana Khine Zawen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Oxford, Saïd Business Schoolen_US
dc.contributor.otherAteneo de Manila Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicineen_US
dc.contributor.otherGreen Templeton Collegeen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherNuffield Department of Clinical Medicineen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity for Peaceen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-23T10:25:06Z
dc.date.available2019-08-23T10:25:06Z
dc.date.issued2018-12-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. Education and awareness raising are the primary tools of global health policy to change public behaviour and tackle antimicrobial resistance. Considering the limitations of an awareness agenda, and the lack of social research to inform alternative approaches, our objective was to generate new empirical evidence on the consequences of antibiotic-related awareness raising in a low-income country context. We implemented an educational activity in two Lao villages to share general antibiotic-related messages and also to learn about people’s conceptions and health behaviours. Two rounds of census survey data enabled us to assess the activity’s outputs, its knowledge outcomes, and its immediate behavioural impacts in a difference-in-difference design. Our panel data covered 1130 adults over two rounds, including 58 activity participants and 208 villagers exposed indirectly via conversations in the village. We found that activity-related communication circulated among more privileged groups, which limited its indirect effects. Among participants, the educational activity influenced the awareness and understanding of “drug resistance”, whereas the effects on attitudes were minor. The evidence on the behavioural impacts was sparse and mixed, but the range of possible consequences included a disproportionate uptake of antibiotics from formal healthcare providers. Our study casts doubt on the continued dominance of awareness raising as a behavioural tool to address antibiotic resistance.en_US
dc.identifier.citationAntibiotics. Vol.7, No.4 (2018)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/antibiotics7040095en_US
dc.identifier.issn20796382en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85056655506en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/44981
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85056655506&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biologyen_US
dc.subjectImmunology and Microbiologyen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.subjectPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceuticsen_US
dc.titleThe consequences of AMR education and awareness raising: Outputs, outcomes, and behavioural impacts of an antibiotic-related educational activity in lao PDRen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85056655506&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections