Publication:
Calcium and vitamin D supplementation for prevention of preeclampsia: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

dc.contributor.authorWin Khaingen_US
dc.contributor.authorSakda Arj Ong Vallibhakaraen_US
dc.contributor.authorVisasiri Tantrakulen_US
dc.contributor.authorOrawin Vallibhakaraen_US
dc.contributor.authorSasivimol Rattanasirien_US
dc.contributor.authorMark McEvoyen_US
dc.contributor.authorJohn Attiaen_US
dc.contributor.authorAmmarin Thakkinstianen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Medicineen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Newcastle Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciencesen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-21T06:24:21Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-14T08:02:16Z
dc.date.available2018-12-21T06:24:21Z
dc.date.available2019-03-14T08:02:16Z
dc.date.issued2017-10-18en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. Vitamin D supplementation effects with or without calcium in pregnancy for reducing risk of preeclampsia and gestational or pregnancy induced hypertension are controversial. Literature was systematically searched in Medline, Scopus and Cochrane databases from inception to July 2017. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in English were selected if they had any pair of interventions (calcium, vitamin D, both, or placebo). Systematic review with two-step network-meta-analysis was used to indirectly estimate supplementary effects. Twenty-seven RCTs with 28,000 women were eligible. A direct meta-analysis suggested that calcium, vitamin D, and calcium plus vitamin D could lower risk of preeclampsia when compared to placebo with the pooled risk ratios (RRs) of 0.54 (0.41, 0.70), 0.47 (0.24, 0.89) and 0.50 (0.32, 0.78), respectively. Results of network meta-analysis were similar with the corresponding RRs of 0.49 (0.35, 0.69), 0.43 (0.17, 1.11), and 0.57 (0.30, 1.10), respectively. None of the controls were significant. Efficacy of supplementation, which was ranked by surface under cumulative ranking probabilities, were: vitamin D (47.4%), calcium (31.6%) and calcium plus vitamin D (19.6%), respectively. Calcium supplementation may be used for prevention for preeclampsia. Vitamin D might also worked well but further large scale RCTs are warranted to confirm our findings.en_US
dc.identifier.citationNutrients. Vol.9, No.10 (2017)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/nu9101141en_US
dc.identifier.issn20726643en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85032866870en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/41323
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85032866870&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectAgricultural and Biological Sciencesen_US
dc.titleCalcium and vitamin D supplementation for prevention of preeclampsia: A systematic review and network meta-analysisen_US
dc.typeReviewen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85032866870&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections