Publication: Risk of Potentially Rabid Animal Exposure among Foreign Travelers in Southeast Asia
Issued Date
2012-09-01
Resource Type
ISSN
19352735
19352727
19352727
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-84866931875
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases. Vol.6, No.9 (2012)
Suggested Citation
Watcharapong Piyaphanee, Chatporn Kittitrakul, Saranath Lawpoolsri, Philippe Gautret, Wataru Kashino, Waraluk Tangkanakul, Prangthip Charoenpong, Thitiya Ponam, Suda Sibunruang, Weerapong Phumratanaprapin, Terapong Tantawichien Risk of Potentially Rabid Animal Exposure among Foreign Travelers in Southeast Asia. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases. Vol.6, No.9 (2012). doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0001852 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/14675
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
Risk of Potentially Rabid Animal Exposure among Foreign Travelers in Southeast Asia
Abstract
Background: Each year millions of travelers visit Southeast Asia where rabies is still prevalent. This study aimed to assess the risk of rabies exposure, i.e., by being bitten or licked by an animal, among travelers in Southeast Asia. The secondary objective was to assess their attitudes and practices related to rabies. Methodology/Principal Findings: Foreign travelers departing to the destination outside Southeast Asia were invited to fill out the study questionnaire in the departure hall of Bangkok International Airport. They were asked about their demographic profile, travel characteristics, pre-travel health preparations, their possible exposure and their practices related to rabies during this trip. From June 2010 to February 2011, 7,681 completed questionnaires were collected. Sixty-two percent of the travelers were male, and the median age was 32 years. 34.0% of the participants were from Western/Central Europe, while 32.1% were from East Asia. Up to 59.3% had sought health information before this trip. Travel clinics were the source of information for 23.6% of travelers. Overall, only 11.6% of the participants had completed their rabies pre-exposure prophylaxis, and 15.3% had received only 1-2 shots, while 73.1% had not been vaccinated at all. In this study, the risk of being bitten was 1.11 per 100 travelers per month and the risk of being licked was 3.12 per 100 travelers per month. Among those who were bitten, only 37.1% went to the hospital to get post exposure treatment. Travelers with East Asian nationalities and longer duration of stay were significantly related to higher risk of animal exposure. Reason for travel was not related to the risk of animal exposure. Conclusions: Travelers were at risk of being exposed to potentially rabid animals while traveling in Southeast Asia. Many were inadequately informed and unprepared for this life-threatening risk. Rabies prevention advice should be included in every pre-travel visit. © 2012 Piyaphanee et al.