Publication:
Learning curve for mastery of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: Perspectives from a large Japanese cohort

dc.contributor.authorLeonardo Zorron Cheng Tao Puen_US
dc.contributor.authorTakeshi Yamamuraen_US
dc.contributor.authorMasanao Nakamuraen_US
dc.contributor.authorMasaya Esakien_US
dc.contributor.authorUayporn Kaosombatwattanaen_US
dc.contributor.authorMiguel R. Rodriguezen_US
dc.contributor.authorSuzanne Edwardsen_US
dc.contributor.authorAlastair D. Burten_US
dc.contributor.authorRajvinder Singhen_US
dc.contributor.authorYoshiki Hirookaen_US
dc.contributor.authorMitsuhiro Fujishiroen_US
dc.contributor.otherFujita Health Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherNagoya University Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherLyell McEwin Health Serviceen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherThe University of Adelaideen_US
dc.contributor.otherNagoya Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T05:08:17Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T05:08:17Z
dc.date.issued2020-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2020 The Authors. JGH Open: An open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology published by Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. Background and Aim: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a challenging procedure. A dissection speed of ≥9 cm2/h has been acknowledged as a mark for expertise, alongside a complication rate of ≤5% and en bloc resection rate of ≥90%. However, there is lack of objective information on whether the three measures correlate with each other. This study aims to evaluate the dissection speed, safety, and efficacy of colorectal ESDs performed by experts and trainees. Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing colorectal ESD at a Japanese hospital (2006–2017) were included in a prospectively collected database. Information on patient demographics, proceduralist, and intra-/postprocedure data was retrieved. The primary outcome was the comparison in dissection speed. The secondary outcomes included differences in safety and efficacy. Log-linear regression models adjusted for confounders (e.g. R0 resection) were used to assess the differences in dissection speed. Results: Five hundred ninety procedures (514 patients) performed by 26 endoscopists were analyzed. Experts performed a higher number of difficult lesions (e.g. F2 fibrosis) but achieved higher dissection speed (10.3 vs 6.7 cm2/h). The difference was statistically significant for both unadjusted and adjusted models (P < 0.0001). The en bloc resection rates were similar for both groups (experts = 95.6%; trainees = 94.7%, P = 0.61). Although nonexperts damaged more of the muscularis propria (18.6 vs 12.5%, P = 0.04), this did not translate into a significant difference in perforation (experts = 3.7%; trainees = 6.9%, P = 0.09) or delayed bleeding (experts = 2.9%; trainees = 4.4%, P = 0.34). The dissection speed steadily increased with expertise. Conclusion: Although dissection speed for colorectal ESD was significantly higher for experts, ESDs could be safely and efficaciously performed by ESD trainees.en_US
dc.identifier.citationJGH Open. (2020)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/jgh3.12298en_US
dc.identifier.issn23979070en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85077974530en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/53873
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85077974530&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleLearning curve for mastery of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: Perspectives from a large Japanese cohorten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85077974530&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections