Publication:
Outcome and prognostic factors for periampullary carcinoma after pancreaticoduodenectomy: A single tertiary center experience

dc.contributor.authorP. Kositamongkolen_US
dc.contributor.authorT. Kumjornkijbovornen_US
dc.contributor.authorP. Mahawithitwongen_US
dc.contributor.authorC. Tovikkaien_US
dc.contributor.authorW. Dumronggittiguleen_US
dc.contributor.authorP. Sangserestiden_US
dc.contributor.authorS. Limsrichamrernen_US
dc.contributor.authorY. Sirivatanauksornen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-25T10:42:54Z
dc.date.available2020-08-25T10:42:54Z
dc.date.issued2020-05-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION OF THAILAND| 2020. Objective: Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) remains the standard treatment in achieving long-term outcome for periampullary carcinoma. This study aims to evaluate outcome and prognostic factors of PD in a large tertiary center in Thailand. Materials and Methods: This study is a single-center, retrospective study including patients who underwent PD for periampullary carcinoma at Siriraj Hospital from 2011 to 2015. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify poor clinicopathological prognostic factors for survival after PD. Results: A total of 128 patients who underwent PD for periampullary carcinoma at Siriraj Hospital between 2011 and 2015 were included. Five-year overall survival was 16% with median survival time of 23 months. Patients with ampullary cancer (25.7%) and duodenal cancer (21.1%) had longer 5-year survival than pancreatic cancer (13.3%) and distal cholangiocarcinoma (0%) (p<0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that independent adverse prognostic factors were perineural invasion (HR: 3.94, 95% CI: 1.90 to 6.40, p<0.01), N2 nodal status (HR: 2.98, 95% CI: 1.16 to 7.64, p = 0.02), positive resection margin (HR: 1.93, 95% CI: 1.19 to 3.14, p = 0.047), lymphovascular invasion (HR: 1.73, 95% CI: 1.03 to 2.90, p = 0.03) and pre-operative albumin <3.5 g/dl (HR 1.71, 95% CI: 1.09 to 2.67, p = 0.02). Tumors with perineural invasion also had higher rate of lymphovascular invasion. Patients with low albumin level had higher proportion of T3 and T4 staging, and poorly differentiated tumors. Notably, pre-operative biliary drainage and total bilirubin were not significant predictive factors. Conclusion: Poor prognostic factors for periampullary carcinoma after PD included N2 nodal status, perineural invasion, lymphovascular invasion, positive resection margin and low albumin level. Therefore, radical surgical resection and pre-operative improvement of nutritional status should be considered.en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of the Medical Association of Thailand. Vol.103, No.5 (2020), 61-67en_US
dc.identifier.issn01252208en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85086006223en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/58163
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85086006223&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleOutcome and prognostic factors for periampullary carcinoma after pancreaticoduodenectomy: A single tertiary center experienceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85086006223&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections