Publication:
Adapting microarray gene expression signatures for early melioidosis diagnosis

dc.contributor.authorOrnuma Sangwichianen_US
dc.contributor.authorToni Whistleren_US
dc.contributor.authorArnone Nithichanonen_US
dc.contributor.authorChidchamai Kewcharoenwongen_US
dc.contributor.authorMyint Myint Seinen_US
dc.contributor.authorChawitar Arayanuphumen_US
dc.contributor.authorNarisara Chantratitaen_US
dc.contributor.authorGanjana Lertmemongkolchaien_US
dc.contributor.otherCenters for Disease Control and Preventionen_US
dc.contributor.otherKhon Kaen Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherThailand Ministry of Public Healthen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-25T10:32:49Z
dc.date.available2020-08-25T10:32:49Z
dc.date.issued2020-07-01en_US
dc.description.abstractCopyright © 2020 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved. Melioidosis is caused by Burkholderia pseudomallei and is predominantly seen in tropical regions. The clinical signs and symptoms of the disease are nonspecific and often result in misdiagnosis, failure of treatment, and poor clinical outcome. Septicemia with septic shock is the most common cause of death, with mortality rates above 40%. Bacterial culture is the gold standard for diagnosis, but it has low sensitivity and takes days to produce definitive results. Early laboratory diagnosis can help guide physicians to provide treatment specific to B. pseudomallei. In our study, we adapted host gene expression signatures obtained from microarray data of B. pseudomallei-infected cases to develop a real-time PCR diagnostic test using two differentially expressed genes, AIM2 (absent in melanoma 2) and FAM26F (family with sequence similarity 26, member F). We tested blood from 33 patients with B. pseudomallei infections and 29 patients with other bacterial infections to validate the test and determine cutoff values for use in a cascading diagnostic algorithm. Differentiation of septicemic melioidosis from other sepsis cases had a sensitivity of 82%, specificity of 93%, and negative and positive predictive values (NPV and PPV) of 82% and 93%, respectively. Separation of cases likely to be melioidosis from those unlikely to be melioidosis in nonbacteremic situations showed a sensitivity of 40%, specificity of 54%, and NPV and PPV of 44% and 50%, respectively. We suggest that our AIM2 and FAM26F expression combination algorithm could be beneficial for early melioidosis diagnosis, offering a result within 24 h of admission.en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Clinical Microbiology. Vol.58, No.7 (2020)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1128/JCM.01906-19en_US
dc.identifier.issn1098660Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn00951137en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85086936486en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/58101
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85086936486&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleAdapting microarray gene expression signatures for early melioidosis diagnosisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85086936486&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections