Publication:
Detection of anti-dsDNA by ELISA using different sources of antigens

dc.contributor.authorKritsana Janyapoonen_US
dc.contributor.authorPantakit Jivakanonten_US
dc.contributor.authorRungkarn Surbrsingen_US
dc.contributor.authorWijitporn Siriprapapanen_US
dc.contributor.authorThanarat Tachawuttiwaten_US
dc.contributor.authorSunee Korbsrisateen_US
dc.contributor.otherRangsit Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-21T08:30:23Z
dc.date.available2018-06-21T08:30:23Z
dc.date.issued2005-02-01en_US
dc.description.abstractAim: To compare different sources of DNA for use in ELISA-based assays for anti-dsDNA antibody detection in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) diagnosis. Method: Bacterial genomic DNA from Flavobacterium menignosepticum, Proteus vulgalis, Seratia marcescens, Streptococcus pyogenes and Salmonella typhimurium and genomic DNA from human blood were used as antigens for IgG anti-dsDNA detection by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Eighty-six sera were tested, 28 derived from patients with SLE, 28 from patients with other rheumatic diseases and 30 from normal human subjects. Results: Genomic DNA from Flavobacterium menignosepticum and human blood had high sensitivity (75%, 82%) and specificity (91%, 91%) for anti-dsDNA detection in diagnosis of SLE. However, human genomic DNA was the most effective antigen of all antigens studied. The assay had a higher sensitivity but lower specificity than commercial ELISA (61% sensitivity and 95% specificity). There was a high level of correlation between commercial ELISA and ELISA using human genomic DNA as antigen (r=0.776, p<0.001) and they exhibited a high level of diagnostic agreement with each other (κ=0.890, p<0.001). Conclusion: The genomic DNA from human blood is a potentially useful source of antigen for the detection of anti-dsDNA by ELISA. However, further studies are required to compare the performance of ELISA using this source of antigen against commercial radioimmunoassays for anti-dsDNA detection. © 2005 Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia.en_US
dc.identifier.citationPathology. Vol.37, No.1 (2005), 63-68en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/09638280400025036en_US
dc.identifier.issn00313025en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-14644416467en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/17067
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=14644416467&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleDetection of anti-dsDNA by ELISA using different sources of antigensen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=14644416467&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections