Publication:
Reliability and Correlation of the Force-PRO Device and Computer-Assisted Navigation System for Measurement of Acetabular Cup Position in Total Hip Arthroplasty

dc.contributor.authorChaiyanun Vijittrakarnrungen_US
dc.contributor.authorUdomporn Manupibulen_US
dc.contributor.authorWarakorn Charoensuken_US
dc.contributor.authorSiwadol Wongsaken_US
dc.contributor.authorPaphon Sa-Ngasoongsongen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-25T10:41:09Z
dc.date.available2020-08-25T10:41:09Z
dc.date.issued2020-05-28en_US
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION: Acetabular cup malposition is very common in total hip arthroplasty (THA) and is significantly associated with many serious postoperative complications, such as dislocation, wear and loosening, and decreased range of motion. To improve the accuracy of intraoperative assessment, we recently developed an innovative sensor-based navigation system (Force-PRO device) using an inertial measurement unit and a 3D-printed liner for acetabular cup measurement, and aimed to evaluate its reliability and correlate its accuracy with that of a computer-assisted navigation system (CANS). DESIGN: Method-comparison study between the Force-PRO device and a standard CANS in a 1:1 pelvic bone model. METHODS: The test-retest reliability of both the Force-PRO device and CANS, and agreement between the Force-PRO device and CANS, for the measurement of acetabular inclination and anteversion angles, were examined using 40 random acetabular cup positions. Statistical analysis was performed by using limits of agreement and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: The mean differences in the inclination angle and anteversion angle in test-retest of the Force-PRO device were -0.43°±1.03° and -0.40°±0.78°, respectively. The mean differences in the inclination angle and anteversion angle between the Force-PRO device and CANS were 0.70°±0.94° and -0.10°±0.44°, respectively. Excellent reliability in the inclination and anteversion angles of the Force-PRO device and excellent agreement between the Force-PRO device and CANS were demonstrated, with ICC values of 0.994 and 0.997, and 0.993 and 0.999, respectively. CONCLUSION: The Force-PRO device showed excellent reliability equivalent to CANS with excellent agreement in acetabular cup position measurement comparable to that with CANS. Future clinical studies will be needed to evaluate the efficacy of this device.en_US
dc.identifier.citationSurgical technology international. Vol.36, (2020), 63-69en_US
dc.identifier.issn10903941en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85085664600en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/58151
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85085664600&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleReliability and Correlation of the Force-PRO Device and Computer-Assisted Navigation System for Measurement of Acetabular Cup Position in Total Hip Arthroplastyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85085664600&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections