Publication:
Monomer elution in relation to degree of conversion for different types of composite

dc.contributor.authorPong Pongprueksaen_US
dc.contributor.authorJan De Muncken_US
dc.contributor.authorRadu Corneliu Ducaen_US
dc.contributor.authorKatrien Poelsen_US
dc.contributor.authorAdrian Covacien_US
dc.contributor.authorPeter Hoeten_US
dc.contributor.authorLode Godderisen_US
dc.contributor.authorBart Van Meerbeeken_US
dc.contributor.authorKirsten L. Van Landuyten_US
dc.contributor.otherKU Leuven– University Hospital Leuvenen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherKU Leuvenen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversiteit Antwerpenen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-23T10:03:42Z
dc.date.available2018-11-23T10:03:42Z
dc.date.issued2015-12-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2015 Elsevier Ltd. Objectives The aim of this study was to determine the degree of conversion (DC) and the monomer release of three composite types when employed following a layer- and bulk-filling technique. Methods The release of monomers from a 'conventional paste-like' (Filtek Z250), a 'conventional flowable' (Filtek Supreme XTE Flowable) and a 'bulk-fill' flowable composite (Filtek Bulk Fill Flowable) from the same manufacturer (3M ESPE, Seefeld, Germany) was determined. Ten cylindrical specimens per composite were built, either in two 2-mm layers or in one 4-mm bulk. DC was measured at the specimen top and bottom surface using micro-Raman spectroscopy, after which the specimens were immersed in 2 ml absolute ethanol for 24 h at 37 °C. This solution was refreshed weekly during six weeks and the concentration of BisGMA, BisEMA(6), BisPMA, UDMA, TEGDMA and BPA was determined by liquid chromatography/mass spectroscopy. Results DC at the specimen top and bottom was similar except for the bulk-fill technique, which resulted in significantly lower DC at the specimen bottom. The release of BisGMA and TEGDMA was initially very high, but rapidly dropped in the second week. In contrast, the release of BisPMA and UDMA increased initially, but then declined towards the sixth week. BisEMA(6) release was relatively steady over time. All composites released small amounts of BPA. The total monomer release was significantly lower for the layer- than the bulk-filling technique. Conclusions The slightly reduced degree of conversion at 4-mm depth resulted in a higher monomer elution when the composite was applied following a bulk-fill application method. Clinical significance Applying a flowable and a bulk-fill composite following a bulk-fill application method resulted in a significantly reduced degree of conversion at the bottom of polymerized composite specimens when compared to a layer-application method. This reduced polymerization degree was reflected in significantly increased monomer release.en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Dentistry. Vol.43, No.12 (2015), 1448-1455en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jdent.2015.10.013en_US
dc.identifier.issn03005712en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84951299804en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/35862
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84951299804&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectDentistryen_US
dc.titleMonomer elution in relation to degree of conversion for different types of compositeen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84951299804&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections