Publication:
Preoperative mapping of the supplementary motor area in patients with brain tumor using resting-state fMRI with seed-based analysis

dc.contributor.authorJ. Wongsripuemteten_US
dc.contributor.authorA. E. Tyanen_US
dc.contributor.authorA. Carassen_US
dc.contributor.authorS. Agarwalen_US
dc.contributor.authorS. K. Gujaren_US
dc.contributor.authorJ. J. Pillaien_US
dc.contributor.authorH. I. Sairen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherJohns Hopkins Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherThe Johns Hopkins School of Medicineen_US
dc.contributor.otherRussell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Scienceen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-23T11:51:42Z
dc.date.available2019-08-23T11:51:42Z
dc.date.issued2018-08-01en_US
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The supplementary motor area can be a critical region in the preoperative planning of patients undergoing brain tumor resection because it plays a role in both language and motor function. While primary motor regions have been successfully identified using resting-state fMRI, there is variability in the literature regarding the identification of the supplementary motor area for preoperative planning. The purpose of our study was to compare resting-state fMRI to task-based fMRI for localization of the supplementary motor area in a large cohort of patients with brain tumors presenting for preoperative brain mapping. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-six patients with brain tumors were evaluated with resting-state fMRI using seed-based analysis of hand and orofacial motor regions. Rates of supplementary motor area localization were compared with those in healthy controls and with localization results by task-based fMRI. RESULTS: Localization of the supplementary motor area using hand motor seed regions was more effective than seeding using orofacial motor regions for both patients with brain tumor (95.5% versus 34.8%, P .001) and controls (95.2% versus 45.2%, P .001). Bilateral hand motor seeding was superior to unilateral hand motor seeding in patients with brain tumor for either side (95.5% versus 75.8%/75.8% for right/left, P .001). No difference was found in the ability to identify the supplementary motor area between patients with brain tumors and controls. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to task-based fMRI, seed-based analysis of resting-state fMRI represents an equally effective method for supplementary motor area localization in patients with brain tumors, with the best results obtained with bilateral hand motor region seeding.en_US
dc.identifier.citationAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology. Vol.39, No.8 (2018), 1493-1498en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3174/ajnr.A5709en_US
dc.identifier.issn1936959Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn01956108en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85051433580en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/46477
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85051433580&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titlePreoperative mapping of the supplementary motor area in patients with brain tumor using resting-state fMRI with seed-based analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85051433580&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections