Publication:
Therapeutic responses to antibacterial drugs in vivax malaria

dc.contributor.authorSasithon Pukrittayakameeen_US
dc.contributor.authorRalf Clemensen_US
dc.contributor.authorArun Chantraen_US
dc.contributor.authorApichart Nontpraserten_US
dc.contributor.authorTanee Luknamen_US
dc.contributor.authorSornchai Looareesuwanen_US
dc.contributor.authorNicholas J. Whiteen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherJohn Radcliffe Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherSmithKline Beechamen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-07T09:42:25Z
dc.date.available2018-09-07T09:42:25Z
dc.date.issued2001-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstractSome antibacterial drugs have antimalarial activity that can be exploited for the prevention or treatment of malaria. Monotherapy with tetracycline, doxycycline, clindamycin or azithromycin was assessed in 1995-98 in 92 adult patients in Thailand with Plasmodium vivax malaria. All patients recovered following treatment and the early therapeutic responses were similar among the 4 groups. The overall median fever clearance time was 57 h and the mean (SD) overall time to parasite clearance was 134 (48) h. Of 66 patients who completed a 28-day follow-up, reappearances of vivax infection occurred in 27 patients (41%) from all groups; delayed appearances of falciparum malaria occurred in 6 patients (9%), only from the azithromycin group. The overall mean (SD) time to reappearance of P. vivax was 23 (5) days and time taken for detection of falciparum malaria was 13 (4) days after starting treatment for vivax malaria. The 28-day cumulative cure rates of clindamycin (n = 12), tetracycline (n = 18) and doxycycline (n = 18) groups were similar (P ≥ 0.14) and all were significantly higher compared to the azithromycin group (n = 18; P ≤ 0.04). The intervals until vivax reappearance were also significantly shorter in the azithromycin group [mean (SD) = 21 (6) vs 25 (3) days, P < 0.05] suggesting that some of these were recrudescences. The apparent success rate (no subsequent appearances of either vivax or falciparum infection) was significantly lower for the azithromycin group (11%) compared to the other groups (34-78%; P < 0.01). In current antibacterial treatment regimens, short-course azithromycin has inferior antimalarial activity compared to clindamycin or the tetracyclines.en_US
dc.identifier.citationTransactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. Vol.95, No.5 (2001), 524-528en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/S0035-9203(01)90027-6en_US
dc.identifier.issn00359203en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-0035467617en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/26586
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0035467617&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectImmunology and Microbiologyen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleTherapeutic responses to antibacterial drugs in vivax malariaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0035467617&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections