Publication:
Population dynamics of a reintroduced population of captive-raised gibbons (Hylobates lar) on Phuket, Thailand

dc.contributor.authorPetra Osterbergen_US
dc.contributor.authorPhamon Samphanthamiten_US
dc.contributor.authorOwart Maprangen_US
dc.contributor.authorSuwit Punnadeeen_US
dc.contributor.authorWarren Y. Brockelmanen_US
dc.contributor.otherGibbon Rehabilitation Projecten_US
dc.contributor.otherWild Animal Rescue Foundation of Thailanden_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherBioresources Technology Uniten_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-09T01:47:32Z
dc.date.available2018-11-09T01:47:32Z
dc.date.issued2014-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstractConfiscated and donated white-handed gibbons (Hylobates lar) originating from the local wildlife trade have been rescued by the Gibbon Rehabilitation Project (GRP) and rehabilitated on Phuket since 1992. Here we present some results of this long-term gibbon reintroduction project. Following unsuccessful early release attempts beginning in 1993, GRP has experimented with reintroduction methods and developed a protocol that has succeeded in re-establishing a small independent breeding population in a 22-km2 forest fragment on Phuket. Eight breeding families of gibbons were released into the Khao Phra Thaew non-hunting area between October 2002 and November 2012 using a soft-release reintroduction method in which the gibbons were provisioned with fresh food in the trees for at least one year, or as long as they needed it. The adult pair in the first gibbon family that was reintroduced there has remained together for 10 years post-release, they have maintained the original pair-bond and raised three wild-born offspring. The reintroduced population has seen eleven infants born in the wild, including a second-generation gibbon born to the first wild-born female. Female interbirth intervals and ages at first reproduction in the reintroduced population are comparable with those in wild populations. Of the seven adult females originally released, two remain with their original mates and two remain in the wild paired with different mates. By the end of 2012, three of the six wild groups were not nuclear families, indicating a flexibility of group composition seen in well-studied wild populations.en_US
dc.identifier.citationPrimate Conservation. Vol.28, No.1 (2014), 179-188en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1896/052.028.0114en_US
dc.identifier.issn08986207en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84926450928en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/33131
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84926450928&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectAgricultural and Biological Sciencesen_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental Scienceen_US
dc.titlePopulation dynamics of a reintroduced population of captive-raised gibbons (Hylobates lar) on Phuket, Thailanden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84926450928&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections